The use of remote sensing imagery for monitoring recovery in the aftermath of a natural disaster: the Hurricane Katrina Case


Autoria(s): Verrucci, Enrica
Contribuinte(s)

Bitelli, Gabriele

Data(s)

20/03/2008

Resumo

Although Recovery is often defined as the less studied and documented phase of the Emergency Management Cycle, a wide literature is available for describing characteristics and sub-phases of this process. Previous works do not allow to gain an overall perspective because of a lack of systematic consistent monitoring of recovery utilizing advanced technologies such as remote sensing and GIS technologies. Taking into consideration the key role of Remote Sensing in Response and Damage Assessment, this thesis is aimed to verify the appropriateness of such advanced monitoring techniques to detect recovery advancements over time, with close attention to the main characteristics of the study event: Hurricane Katrina storm surge. Based on multi-source, multi-sensor and multi-temporal data, the post-Katrina recovery was analysed using both a qualitative and a quantitative approach. The first phase was dedicated to the investigation of the relation between urban types, damage and recovery state, referring to geographical and technological parameters. Damage and recovery scales were proposed to review critical observations on remarkable surge- induced effects on various typologies of structures, analyzed at a per-building level. This wide-ranging investigation allowed a new understanding of the distinctive features of the recovery process. A quantitative analysis was employed to develop methodological procedures suited to recognize and monitor distribution, timing and characteristics of recovery activities in the study area. Promising results, gained by applying supervised classification algorithms to detect localization and distribution of blue tarp, have proved that this methodology may help the analyst in the detection and monitoring of recovery activities in areas that have been affected by medium damage. The study found that Mahalanobis Distance was the classifier which provided the most accurate results, in localising blue roofs with 93.7% of blue roof classified correctly and a producer accuracy of 70%. It was seen to be the classifier least sensitive to spectral signature alteration. The application of the dissimilarity textural classification to satellite imagery has demonstrated the suitability of this technique for the detection of debris distribution and for the monitoring of demolition and reconstruction activities in the study area. Linking these geographically extensive techniques with expert per-building interpretation of advanced-technology ground surveys provides a multi-faceted view of the physical recovery process. Remote sensing and GIS technologies combined to advanced ground survey approach provides extremely valuable capability in Recovery activities monitoring and may constitute a technical basis to lead aid organization and local government in the Recovery management.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://amslaurea.unibo.it/104/1/laurea_specialistica_ev.pdf

Verrucci, Enrica (2008) The use of remote sensing imagery for monitoring recovery in the aftermath of a natural disaster: the Hurricane Katrina Case. [Laurea specialistica], Università di Bologna, Corso di Studio in Ingegneria per l'ambiente e il territorio [LS-DM509] <http://amslaurea.unibo.it/view/cds/CDS0450/>

Relação

http://amslaurea.unibo.it/104/

Adams, B.J., Huyck, C.K. and Eguchi, R.T., (2003a), ‘The Boumerdes (Algeria)Earthquake of May 21, 2003: Preliminary Reconnaissance Using Remotely Sensed Data’. MCEER, Buffalo. [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007].Available from World Wide Web: < http://mceer.buffalo.edu/research/boumerdes/default.asp.> Adams, B.J., Huyck. C.K., Eguchi., R.T., Yamazaki, F. and Estrada, M., (2003b), ‘Postearthquake Reconnaissance using Satellite Imagery: Boumerdes Case Study’, EERI(ed.) The Boumerdes, Algeria, Earthquake May 21, 2003, EERI, Insert p. 1-8. Adams, B.J., Huyck, C.K., Mio, M., Cho, S., Ghosh, S., Chung H., Eguchi, R.T., Houshmand,B. and Shinozuka, M and Mansouri, B., (2004), ‘The Bam (Iran) Earth- quake of December 26, 2003: Preliminary Reconnaissance Using Remotely Sensed Data and the VIEWS (Visualizing the Impacts of Earthquakes with Satellites) System’. MCEER, Buffalo. [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007].Available from World Wide Web: < http://mceer.buffalo.edu/research/Bam/bam.pdf.> Adams, B.J., Huyck, C.K., Mansouri, B., Eguchi, R.T., and Shinozuka, M. (2004a), ‘Application of high-resolution optical satellite imagery for post-earthquake damage as- sessment: The 2003 Boumerdes (Algeria) and Bam (Iran) earthquakes’, MCEER Re- search and Accomplishments 2003-2004, MCEER, Buffalo. Adams, B.J., Womble, J.A., Mio, M.Z., Turner, J.B., Mehta, K.C., and Ghosh, S. (2004b), ‘Field Report: Collection of Satellite-Referenced Building Damage Information in the Aftermath of Hurricane Charley.’ Response, MCEER, Buffalo. [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007].Available from World Wide Web: <http://mceer.buffalo.edu/research/Reconnaissance/Charley8-13-04/04-SP04.pdf.> Adams, B.J., Mio, M.Z., Cho, S., Huyck, C.K., Eguchi, R.T., Womble, J.A, and Mehta, K.C. (2004c), ‘Streamlining Post-Disaster Data Collection Using VIEWS and VRS Proceed- ings’. In: Second International Workshop on the Use of Remote Sensing for Post-Disaster Response, Newport Beach, CA [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://mceer.buffalo.edu/publications/workshop/05- SP03/Program.asp> Blake, E.S., Rappaport, E.N. and Landsea, C.W.(2007), ‘The deadliest, costliest, and most intense United States Tropical Cyclones from 1851 to 2006 ( and other frequently re- quested hurricane facts).’, NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS TPC-5 - NCH Miami. Campbell, J.B. (1996), ‘Introduction to Remote Sensing- Second Edition’ Taylor & Francis, London. EEFIT report (2006), ‘The Indian Ocean Tsunami of December 26, 2004: Mission Findings in Sri Lanka and Thailand’, London: EEFIT, 22-31. Encyclopaedia Britannica (2007), [online]. [Accessed 23rd November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web:< http://www.search.eb.com/eb/article-9106251> FEMA (2003a), HAZUS ® Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Hurricane Model, Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. FEMA- U.S. Department of Homeland Security, (2007) [online]. [Accessed 23rd November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web:<http://www. fema.gov/rebuild/index.shtm >] FEMA- U.S. Department of Homeland Security, (2007) [online]. [Accessed 23rd November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: < www.fema.gov/hazards/floods/recoverydata/katrina_index.shtm >] Ghosh, S., Huyck, C.K., Adams, B. J., Eguchi, R.T., Yamazaki, F., and Matsuoka, M. (2005), ‘Preliminary Field Report: Post-Tsunami Urban Damage Survey in Thailand, Using the VIEWS Reconnaissance System’, MCEER, Buffalo. [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://mceer.buffalo.edu/research/Reconnaissance/tsunami12-26-04/05-SP01.pdf. > Gomarasca M.A. (1997), "Introduzione a telerilevamento e GIS per la Gestione delle Risorse agricole e Ambientali", Ed. AIT. Gusella, L., Adams, B.J., Bitelli, G. (2007), ‘Use of Mobile Mapping Technology for Post-Disaster Damage Information Collection and Integration with Remote Sensing Imagery.’In: 5th International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology, Padua. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein Its’hak.(1973), ‘Textural Features for Image Classification.’ IEEE, vol.SMC-3, No.6. Hill, A.A., Keys-Mathews, L.D. ‘Geography, Disaster Recovery and remote sensing.’ In: 3rd International Workshop for Remote Sensing for Post Disaster Response, Septem- ber 2005. Hill, A. A., Keys-Mathews, L. D., Adams, B. J. and Podolsky, D. ‘Remote Sensing and Recovery: A Case Study on the Gulf Coast of the United States.’ In: 4th International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Post-Disaster Response, September 2006. Kates, R. W., Pijawka, D. (1977). ‘Chapter 1: From Rubble to Monument: The Pace of Recovery’. In: Reconstruction Following Disaster. J. E. Haas, R. W. Kates and M. J. Bowden, eds. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. pp. 1 – 23. Knabb, R.D., Rhome, J.R., and Brown, D.P. (2005), ‘Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Katrina 23-30 August 2005’, National Hurricane Center, 20 December 2005. CA [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122005_Katrina.pdf.> Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W. (2004), ‘Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation - Fifth Edition’. John Wiley & Sons, Canada. Lindell, M. (2006), ‘Introduction to Emergency Management’. Electronic Textbook Development Project, Chapter 11, Texas A&M University. In: Janu- ary 6, 2006 FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project Activity Report. Liu, A., Fellowes, M., Mabanta, M. (2006), ‘Special Edition of the Katrina Index: A One-Year Review of Key Indicators of Recovery in Post-Storm New Orleans’. The Brookings In- stitution- Special Analysis in Metropolitan Policy. Maloney, E. D. and Hartmann, D.L. (2000), ‘Modulation of Hurricane Activity in the Gulf of Mexico by the Madden-Julian Oscillation’. Science, Vol. 287 [online]. [Accessed 28th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: < http:// www.sciencemag.org.> MCEER, (2007) [online]. [Accessed 23rd November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www. mceer.buffalo.edu >. Miller, B. I. (1967), ‘Characteristics of Hurricanes’ Science, New Series, vol. 157, no. 3795, pp. 1389-1399. Nakagawa,Y. and Shaw, R. (2004), ‘Social Capital: A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery’. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 5-34. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.iedm.ges.kyoto.ac.jp/publication/papers/Social%20Capital%20A%20missin g%20link%20to%20disaster%20recovery.pdf> Ouattara, T., Couture, R., Bobrowsky, P.T. and Moore A. (2004), “Remote Sensing: Theory and Principles”, Geological Survey of Canada -Open File 4542. Pohl, C. (1999), ‘Tools and Methods for Fusion of Images of Different Spatial Resolution’. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol.32, Part 7-4-3-W6. Quarantelli, E. L. (1991), ‘Disaster Assistance and Socioeconomic Recovery at individual and Household Level: Some Observation’. University of Delaware – Disaster Research Center, Report no.: Preliminary Paper; 171 Quarantelli, E. L. (1999), ‘The Disaster Recovery Process: What We Know And Do Not Know From Research’. University of Delaware – Disaster Research Center, Report no.: Preliminary Paper; 286.[online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://dspace.udel.edu:8080/dspace/handle/19716/309?mode=simple> Perkins, S. (2005), ‘Coming Storms’ Science News, Vol. 167, No. 17, p. 262. RSI - Research System Inc. (2003), ENVI ® User’s Guide Riehl, H., (1963), ‘On the Origin and Possible Modification of Hurricanes’ Science, New Series, Vol. 141, No. 3585., pp. 1001-1010. Roberson, B. C. (2003), ‘Rigorous Geometric Modelling and Correction of QuickBird Imagery’, Earth Observation Systems MacDonald Dettwiler & Associated Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. Saito, K., Spence, R., (2004), ‘Using High-resolution Satellite Images for PostEarthquake Building Damage Assessment: A Study Following the 26.1.01 Gujurat Earthquake’, Earthquake Spectra, -March 2006 – Vol. 22 Schwab, J., Topping, K. C., Eadie, C. C., Deyle, R. E., Smith, R.A. (1998), ‘Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction’. PAS Report No. 483/484. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association. 346 pp. Spott, P. N. (2004), ‘Why So Many Hurricanes?’ The Christian Science Monitor, September 13 [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0913/p01s03-usgn.html> Tuscaloosa County Emergency Management Agency. (2007) [online]. [Accessed 27th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web:< http://www.tuscoema.org/ > Toutin, T. (2004), ‘Review article: Geometric Processing of Remote Sensing images: models, algorithms and methods’, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol.25, No.10, 1893- 1924 Web, G. R., Tierney, K.J., Dahlhamer, J.M. (1999), ‘Predicting Long-term Bussiness Recovery from Disaster: a comparison of the Loma Prieta Earthquake and Hurricane Andrew’. University of Delaware – Disaster Research Center, Report no.: Preliminary Paper; 292. Womble, J.A. (2005), ‘Remote-Sensing Applications to Windstorm Damage Assessment’. Doctoral Dissertation, Wind Science and Engineering Program, Texas Tech University. [Accessed 27th November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: < http://etd.lib.ttu.edu/theses/available/etd-11302005-213422/.> Womble, J.A., Adams, B.J., and Mehta, K.C. (2005), ‘Windstorm Damage Surveys Using High-Resolution Satellite Images.’ Proceedings, 10th Americas Conference on Wind En- gineering, Baton Rouge. Womble, J. A., Ghosh, S., Adams, B. J. and Friedland C.J. (2006), ‘Advance Damage Detection for Hurricane Katrina : Integrated Remote Sensing and VIEWS TM Field Re- connaissance’MCEER SPECIAL REPORT SERIES- Engineering and Organizational Issues Before During and After Hurricane Katrina, vol.2–Remote Sensing. Worldfishcenter, (2007) [online]. [Accessed 23rd November 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.worldfishcenter.org/news/Press/tsunami/Jan14-2005.htm>

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Palavras-Chave #Remote sensing, GIS, Hurricane Katrina, recovery, supervised classification, texture #scuola :: 843884 :: Ingegneria e Architettura #cds :: 0450 :: Ingegneria per l'ambiente e il territorio [LS-DM509] #orientamento :: 363 :: Protezione del suolo e del territorio #sessione :: terza
Tipo

PeerReviewed