Metformin, but not glimepiride, improves carotid artery diameter and blood flow in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus


Autoria(s): Machado, Helena Atroch; Vieira, Marcelo; Cunha, Maria Rosaria; Correia, Marcia Regina Soares; Fukui, Rosa Tsunechiro; Santos, Rosa Ferreira dos; Rocha, Dalva Marreiro; Wajchenberg, Bernardo Leo; Pasqualucci, Silvia Helena Gelas Lage; Silva, Maria Elizabeth Rossi da
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

06/11/2013

06/11/2013

2012

Resumo

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of glimepiride and metformin on vascular reactivity, hemostatic factors and glucose and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 16 uncontrolled patients with diabetes previously treated with dietary intervention. The participants were randomized into metformin or glimepiride therapy groups. After four months, the patients were crossed over with no washout period to the alternative treatment for an additional four-month period on similar dosage schedules. The following variables were assessed before and after four months of each treatment: 1) fasting glycemia, insulin, catecholamines, lipid profiles and HbA(1) levels; 2) t-PA and PAI-1 (antigen and activity), platelet aggregation and fibrinogen and plasminogen levels; and 3) the flow indices of the carotid and brachial arteries. In addition, at the end of each period, a 12-hour metabolic profile was obtained after fasting and every 2 hours thereafter. RESULTS: Both therapies resulted in similar decreases in fasting glucose, triglyceride and norepinephrine levels, and they increased the fibrinolytic factor plasminogen but decreased t-PA activity. Metformin caused lower insulin and pro-insulin levels and higher glucagon levels and increased systolic carotid diameter and blood flow. Neither metformin nor glimepiride affected endothelial-dependent or endothelial-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery. CONCLUSIONS: Glimepiride and metformin were effective in improving glucose and lipid profiles and norepinephrine levels. Metformin afforded more protection against macrovascular diabetes complications, increased systolic carotid artery diameter and total and systolic blood flow, and decreased insulin levels. As both therapies increased plasminogen levels but reduced t-PA activity, a coagulation process was likely still ongoing.

Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP

Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)

Identificador

CLINICS, SAO PAULO, v. 67, n. 7, pp. 711-717, JUL, 2012

1807-5932

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/42024

10.6061/clinics/2012(07)03

http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(07)03

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO

SAO PAULO

Relação

CLINICS

Direitos

openAccess

Copyright HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO

Palavras-Chave #TREATMENT #METABOLIC PROFILE #VASCULAR REACTIVITY #HEMOSTATIC FACTORS #TYPE 2 DIABETES #CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS #DOUBLE-BLIND #SULFONYLUREA TREATMENT #GLYCEMIC CONTROL #INSULIN #COMPLICATIONS #GLIBENCLAMIDE #REPAGLINIDE #LIVER #MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion