Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack


Autoria(s): James, Stefan K.; Storey, Robert F.; Khurmi, Nardev S.; Husted, Steen; Keltai, Matyas; Mahaffey, Kenneth W.; Maya, Juan; Morais, Joao; Lopes, Renato D.; Nicolau, Jose C.; Pais, Prem; Raev, Dimitar; Lopez-Sendon, Jose L.; Stevens, Susanna R.; Becker, Richard C.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

05/11/2013

05/11/2013

2012

Resumo

Background-Patients with acute coronary syndromes and history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) have an increased rate of recurrent cardiac events and intracranial hemorrhages. Methods and Results-We evaluated treatment effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome with and without a history of prior stroke or TIA in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Of the 18 624 randomized patients, 1152 (6.2%) had a history of stroke or TIA. Such patients had higher rates of myocardial infarction (11.5% versus 6.0%), death (10.5% versus 4.9%), stroke (3.4% versus 1.2%), and intracranial bleeding (0.8% versus 0.2%) than patients without prior stroke or TIA. Among patients with a history of stroke or TIA, the reduction of the primary composite outcome and total mortality at 1 year with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel was consistent with the overall trial results: 19.0% versus 20.8% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.13; interaction P=0.84) and 7.9% versus 13.0% (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.91). The overall PLATO-defined bleeding rates were similar: 14.6% versus 14.9% (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.37), and intracranial bleeding occurred infrequently (4 versus 4 cases, respectively). Conclusions-Patients with acute coronary syndrome with a prior history of ischemic stroke or TIA had higher rates of clinical outcomes than patients without prior stroke or TIA. However, the efficacy and bleeding results of ticagrelor in these high-risk patients were consistent with the overall trial population, with a favorable clinical net benefit and associated impact on mortality.

AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca

Eli Lilly

Eli Lilly

Merck

Merck

BristolMyers Squibb

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo

Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo

Accumetrics

Accumetrics

Dynabyte

Dynabyte

Novartis

Novartis

Eisai

Eisai

Bayer

Bayer

Boehringer Ingelheim

Boehringer Ingelheim

GlaxoSmithKline

GlaxoSmithKline

Johnson and Johnson

Johnson and Johnson

Ortho/McNeill

Ortho/McNeill

Sanofi-aventis

SanofiAventis

Daiichi Sankyo

Daiichi Sankyo

Portola Pharmaceuticals

Portola Pharmaceuticals

Pozen

Pozen

Regado Biosciences

Regado Biosciences

Medicines Company

Medicines Company

MSD

MSD

Jaba Recordati

Jaba Recordati

Pfizer

Pfizer

Identificador

CIRCULATION, PHILADELPHIA, v. 125, n. 23, supl. 1, Part 3, pp. 2914-+, 41061, 2012

0009-7322

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/41341

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.082727

http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.082727

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

PHILADELPHIA

Relação

CIRCULATION

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Palavras-Chave #ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME #ANTIPLATELET DRUGS #CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES #STROKE #TICAGRELOR #THROMBIN-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST #PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE #OUTCOMES PLATO TRIAL #ST-SEGMENT-ELEVATION #MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION #PLATELET INHIBITION #ASPIRIN #EVENTS #PREVENTION #RATIONALE #CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS #PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion