Evidence-Based Information on the Clinical Use of Neurofeedback for ADHD


Autoria(s): Moriyama, Tais S.; Polanczyk, Guilherme; Caye, Arthur; Banaschewski, Tobias; Brandeis, Daniel; Rohde, Luis A.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

06/11/2013

06/11/2013

2012

Resumo

Neurofeedback (NF) is a training to enhance self-regulatory capacity over brain activity patterns and consequently over brain mental states. Recent findings suggest that NF is a promising alternative for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We comprehensively reviewed literature searching for studies on the effectiveness and specificity of NF for the treatment of ADHD. In addition, clinically informative evidence-based data are discussed. We found 3 systematic review on the use of NF for ADHD and 6 randomized controlled trials that have not been included in these reviews. Most nonrandomized controlled trials found positive results with medium-to-large effect sizes, but the evidence for effectiveness are less robust when only randomized controlled studies are considered. The direct comparison of NF and sham-NF in 3 published studies have found no group differences, nevertheless methodological caveats, such as the quality of the training protocol used, sample size, and sample selection may have contributed to the negative results. Further data on specificity comes from electrophysiological studies reporting that NF effectively changes brain activity patterns. No safety issues have emerged from clinical trials and NF seems to be well tolerated and accepted. Follow-up studies support long-term effects of NF. Currently there is no available data to guide clinicians on the predictors of response to NF and on optimal treatment protocol. In conclusion, NF is a valid option for the treatment for ADHD, but further evidence is required to guide its use.

Brazilian National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) [483934/2010-0]

Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil

Identificador

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, NEW YORK, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 588-598, JUL, 2012

1933-7213

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/42007

10.1007/s13311-012-0136-7

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-012-0136-7

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

SPRINGER

NEW YORK

Relação

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright SPRINGER

Palavras-Chave #ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD) #NEUROFEEDBACK #BIOFEEDBACK #EEG BIOFEEDBACK #SLOW CORTICAL POTENTIAL #THETA/BETA TRAINING #ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER #DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER #SLOW CORTICAL POTENTIALS #RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL #EEG BIOFEEDBACK #FOLLOW-UP #SELECTIVE ATTENTION #ANTERIOR CINGULATE #STIMULANT-DRUGS #TREATING AD/HD #CLINICAL NEUROLOGY #NEUROSCIENCES #PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion