Breast Milk and Glucose for Pain Relief in Preterm Infants: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial


Autoria(s): Bueno, Mariana; Stevens, Bonnie; de Camargo, Patricia Ponce; Toma, Edi; Jornada Krebs, Vera Lucia; Kimura, Amelia Fumiko
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

29/10/2013

29/10/2013

02/08/2013

Resumo

OBJECTIVE: The study goal was to compare the efficacy of expressed breast milk (EBM) versus 25% glucose on pain responses of late preterm infants during heel lancing. METHODS: In a noninferiority randomized controlled trial, a total of 113 newborns were randomized to receive EBM (experimental group [EG]) or 25% glucose (control group [CG]) before undergoing heel lancing. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Premature Infant Pain Profile [PIPP]) and a 10% noninferiority margin was established. Secondary outcomes were incidence of cry and percentage of time spent crying and adverse events. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was used. RESULTS: Groups were similar regarding demographics and clinical characteristics, except for birth weight and weight at data collection day. There were lower pain scores in the CG over 3 minutes after lancing (P<.001). A higher number of infants in the CG had PIPP scores indicative of minimal pain or absence of pain (P = .002 and P = .003 on ITT analysis) at 30 seconds after lancing, and the mean difference in PIPP scores was 3 (95% confidence interval: 1.507-4.483). Lower incidence of cry (P = .001) and shorter duration of crying (P = .014) were observed for CG. Adverse events were benign and self-limited, and there was no significant difference between groups (P = .736 and P = .637 on ITT analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Results based on PIPP scores and crying time indicate poorer effects of EBM compared with 25% glucose during heel lancing. Additional studies exploring the vol and administration of EBM and its combination with other strategies such as skin-to-skin contact and sucking are necessary. Pediatrics 2012;129:664-670

Identificador

PEDIATRICS, ELK GROVE VILLAGE, v. 129, n. 4, supl. 1, Part 3, pp. 664-670, APR, 2012

0031-4005

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/36431

10.1542/peds.2011-2024

http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2024

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS

ELK GROVE VILLAGE

Relação

PEDIATRICS

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS

Palavras-Chave #NEWBORN #PAIN #ANALGESIA #HUMAN MILK #GLUCOSE #NON-INFERIORITY TRIALS #10-DAY-OLD RATS #PROCEDURAL PAIN #ORAL SUCROSE #HEEL PRICK #NEWBORNS #CHOLECYSTOKININ #HYPOALGESIA #ANALGESIA #MEDIATION #PEDIATRICS
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion