Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis


Autoria(s): Barretti, Pasqual; Pereira Doles, Joao Vitor; Pinotti, Douglas Goncalves; El Dib, Regina
Contribuinte(s)

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Data(s)

18/03/2015

18/03/2015

18/08/2014

Resumo

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Background: The choice of antimicrobials for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is crucial for a favorable outcome. There is no consensus about the best therapy; few prospective controlled studies have been published, and the only published systematic reviews did not report superiority of any class of antimicrobials. The objective of this review was to analyze the results of PD peritonitis treatment in adult patients by employing a new methodology, the proportional meta-analysis.Methods: A review of the literature was conducted. There was no language restriction. Studies were obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were: (a) case series and RCTs with the number of reported patients in each study greater than five, (b) use of any antibiotic therapy for initial treatment (e.g., cefazolin plus gentamicin or vancomycin plus gentamicin), for Gram-positive (e.g., vancomycin or a first generation cephalosporin), or for Gram-negative rods (e.g., gentamicin, ceftazidime, and fluoroquinolone), (c) patients with PD-related peritonitis, and (d) studies specifying the rates of resolution. A proportional meta-analysis was performed on outcomes using a random-effects model, and the pooled resolution rates were calculated.Results: A total of 64 studies (32 for initial treatment and negative culture, 28 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 24 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods) and 21 RCTs met all inclusion criteria (14 for initial treatment and negative culture, 8 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 8 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods). The pooled resolution rate of ceftazidime plus glycopeptide as initial treatment (pooled proportion = 86% [95% CI 0.82-0.89]) was significantly higher than first generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 66% [95% CI 0.57-0.75]) and significantly higher than glycopeptides plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 75% [95% CI 0.69-0.80]. Other comparisons of regimens used for either initial treatment, treatment for Gram-positive rods or Gram-negative rods did not show statistically significant differences.Conclusion: We showed that the association of a glycopeptide plus ceftazidime is superior to other regimens for initial treatment of PD peritonitis. This result should be carefully analyzed and does not exclude the necessity of monitoring the local microbiologic profile in each dialysis center to choice the initial therapeutic protocol.

Formato

11

Identificador

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-445

Bmc Infectious Diseases. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 11 p., 2014.

1471-2334

http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117311

10.1186/1471-2334-14-445

WOS:000341784900001

WOS000341784900001.pdf

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Biomed Central Ltd

Relação

Bmc Infectious Diseases

Direitos

openAccess

Palavras-Chave #Peritonitis #Peritoneal dialysis #Treatment #Meta-analysis
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article