A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities
Data(s) |
01/10/2010
|
---|---|
Resumo |
<b>Context.</b> There is an increasing reliance on the use of camera-trap technologies for surveys of medium to large terrestrial mammals. Camera trapping may, however, also have significant applications for broad-scale surveys of small mammals.<br /><b>Aims.</b> The present study aims to compare results from camera-trapping surveys to those of the more traditional live trapping techniques. Specifically, it aims to test the effectiveness of the techniques for detecting species, and the cost effectiveness of both approaches.<br /><b>Methods.</b> Surveys were conducted across 36 sites in the Grampians National Park, Victoria, Australia, between April and July 2009. At each site, independent surveys were conducted for small mammals by using a combination of Elliot and cage trapping, then camera trapping. Results for the two different approaches were compared for both their ability to generate small-mammal presence data and their cost effectiveness.<br /><b>Key results.</b> Camera-trapping surveys of 36 sites in the Grampians National Park compared favourably with those of live trapping surveys. Similar species were detected across the sites, and camera trapping was a considerably more cost effective than live trapping.<br /><b>Conclusions.</b> Camera-trapping surveys of small terrestrial mammals may provide a new and cost-effective technique for surveying terrestrial small mammals. This is particularly the case when presence data are the main requirement of the survey, with no requirement to capture and tag animals.<br /><b>Implications.</b> Given the cost-effective nature of camera trapping, there is potential to use this approach to increase the level of replication and spatial coverage of small-mammal surveys. Improving the replication and spatial coverage of studies has the potential to significantly increase the scope of research questions that can be asked, thus providing the potential to improve wildlife management.<br /> |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
CSIRO Publishing |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30031482/white-acomparisonof-2010.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR10046 |
Direitos |
2010, CSIRO |
Palavras-Chave | #camera trapping #cost effectiveness #small mammal #survey methods #trapping |
Tipo |
Journal Article |