Using constructed-response and multiple-choice questions in undergraduate examinations


Autoria(s): McElvaney, E. John
Data(s)

01/03/2010

Resumo

This paper looks at the use of constructed-response and multiple-choice questions in first year management examinations involving 2364 students over a three semester period in 2008-9. It also compares student’s performance in research and analytical assignments with their results in Multiple-Choice tests. The results show that students who perform poorly in non-multiple-choice tests are slightly advantaged by multiple-choice tests. However, students who display high distinction scores in other pieces of assessment do not receive any advantage from multiple-choice testing. Interestingly, the research also highlighted that female students perform better in their articulation of management techniques overall, but do not gain the same comparative advantage from multiple choice testing. The analysis of the assessment methods was extremely useful in predicting the level of failures for the unit in the subsequent year. Finding the right balance of assessment tasks in first year university business courses is extremely difficult, using multiple-choice tests can be useful tool as part of the assessment mix in management units.<br />

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30029860

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

World Business Institute, Australia

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30029860/mcelvaney-usingconstructed-2010.pdf

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30029860/mcelvaney-usingconstructed-evidence-2010.pdf

http://wbiaus.org/wjm.htm

Direitos

2010, World Journal of Management

Palavras-Chave #gender #constructed response examinations #multiple choice tests #assessment
Tipo

Journal Article