Journal rankings : does one size fit all?


Autoria(s): Polonsky, Michael
Data(s)

01/01/2004

Resumo

The question of ranking journals, institutions, individual academics and specific papers is regularly visited within business and management disciplines. The Mort, et al. (2004) study advances the discussion by examining this theme within the context of academic marketing in Australia and New Zealand. In this commentary I comment on three aspects of the study that are left partially unanswered: why rank journals in the first place, how should journals be evaluated, and to what extent are the aspirations of academics in the region met?<br />

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30016290

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Dept. of Marketing, Monash University (ANZMAC)

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30016290/polonsky-journalrankingsdoes-2004.pdf

http://wwwdocs.fce.unsw.edu.au/marketing/amj_12_2_polonsky.pdf

Tipo

Journal Article