`Silly, soft and otherwise suspect`: doctoral education as risky business
Data(s) |
01/08/2005
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This article investigates how certain doctoral practices come to count as scandalous and with what effects on universities. To do so, it engages with a number of recent media allegations that relate to doctoral practice in Australia and elsewhere. The analysis of these allegations is developed in terms of three broad categories, namely allegations of silliness in relation to thesis content, allegations of softness in relation to entry, rigour and assessment, and allegations of suspect conduct and/or credentials. The impact of such allegations on university governance is then addressed.<br /> |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
ACER |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30008781/evans-sillysoft-2005.pdf http://find.galegroup.com/itx/retrieve.do?contentSet=IAC-Documents |
Direitos |
2005, Australian Council for Educational Research |
Palavras-Chave | #academic standards #doctoral degrees #doctoral programs #doctoral theses #governance #graduate study #politics of education #student research |
Tipo |
Journal Article |