Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap


Autoria(s): Adams, Carol A.; Evans, Richard
Data(s)

22/06/2004

Resumo

This article deals with two concerns in achieving greater accountability in social reports: the lack of completeness of reporting, and the lack of credibility of reports. The article focuses, in particular, on the role of social audits in improving the completeness and credibility of reporting, thereby reducing the audit expectations gap. We suggest that this gap arises due to an over-emphasis on the validity of performance data at the expense of addressing completeness and credibility, both of which, we argue, require stakeholder involvement. The article reviews recent guidelines aimed at ensuring that companies produce reports that are complete in all material respects including those produced by the Global Reporting Initiative and the Federation des Experts Comptables Europeens, focusing particularly on AccountAbility's AA1000 Standard and AA1000S Assurance Standard. Finally, the article considers the development of a practical approach to social audit following principles increasingly being incorporated into developing assurance guidelines aimed at reducing the audit expectations gap. <br />

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30002395

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Greenleaf Publishing

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30002395/evans-accountabilitycompleteness-2004.pdf

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A119071795

Direitos

2004, Greenleaf Publishing

Palavras-Chave #social auditing #accountability #audit expectations gap #social reporting #assurance guidelines
Tipo

Journal Article