Essays on International trade and economic growth
| Contribuinte(s) |
Jaramillo Mejía, Fernando |
|---|---|
| Data(s) |
27/10/2015
|
| Resumo |
At present, we are witnessing globalization as a truly worldwide phenomenon. Trade agreements among differing countries, a reduction in trade costs, the mobility of production factors, the free flow of information and so on are all proof of the present day era of globalization. Countries are trading with one another more and more every day and the effects of international trade on economies represent a central discussion in all economic spheres. In spite of increasing trade around the world and the promotion of globalization by multilateral organisms such as WTO and IMF, the effects of international trade are not yet clear. Economics literature concerning the effects of international trade on economic growth and welfare remains ambiguous in terms of both theoretical models and empirical research. The present thesis tries to contribute to the theoretical debate surrounding the effects of dynamic international trade, focusing in particular on the implications for economic growth, welfare and changes in the preferences of individuals. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Idioma(s) |
spa |
| Publicador |
Facultad de Economía |
| Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Fonte |
instname:Universidad del Rosario reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR Antweiler, W., & Trefler, D. (2002). Increasing Returns and All That: A View from Trade. American Economic Review, 93-119. Bohman, H., & Nilsson, D. (2007). Income Inequality as a Determinant of Trade Flows. International Journal of Applied Economics, 40-59 Chung, C. (2006). Non-homothetic Preferences and the Home Market Effect: Does Relative Market Size Matter? Georgia Institute of Technology. Crozet, M., & Trionfetti, F. (2008). Trade Costs and the Home Market Effect. Journal of International Economics, 309-321 Dalgin, M., Mitra, D., & Trindade, V. (2008). Inequality, Non-homothetic Preferences, and Trade: A Gravity Approach. Southern Economic Journal, 747-774. Davis, D., & Weinstein, D. (2003). Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of International Economics, 1-23 Desdoigts, A., & Jaramillo, F. (2009). Trade, Demand Spillovers, and Industralization: The emerging global middle class in perspective. Journal of International Economics, 248-258 Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market Structure and Foreing Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review, 950-959. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 483-499. Markusen, J. (1986). Explaining the Volume of Trade: An eclectic approach. American Economic Review, 1002-1011. Matsuyama, K. (2000). A Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods under Nonhomothetic Preferences: Demand complementarities, income distribution, and North-South trade. The Journal of Political Economy, 1093-1120. Mitra, D., & Trindade, V. (2005). Inequality and Trade. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1253-1271. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 71-102. Stokey, N. (1991). The Volume and Composition of Trade Between Rich and Poor Countries. The Review of Economic Studies, 63-80. Zweimüller, J. (2000). Inequality, Redistribution, and Economic Growth. Empirica, 1-20. TDEC |
| Palavras-Chave | #Comercio internacional -- Ensayos, conferencias, etc. #Crecimientos económico -- Ensayos, conferencias, etc. #382.01 |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
