How can strategic philanthropy contribute to innovation for companies


Autoria(s): Matteucci, Alessandro
Contribuinte(s)

Marais, Magalie

Data(s)

07/05/2014

Resumo

This investigation proposes to explore the existing link between a strategic conception of philanthropy and innovation. Indeed, the nature of the research question relies on an unexplored field in the CSR and Innovation management academic literature. It starts with the interest to know which the benefits are for a firm encouraged to invest strategically in philanthropy. In this regard, the analysis contributes in fitting this gap by following different objectives in an exploratory perspective. Throughout the research it will be analyzed the concept and the current and past contributions on the different branches of innovation (product innovation, managerial innovation, technological innovation), to accentuate the relation between an accurate strategic approach to philanthropy and the impact on the organizational value. Indeed, analyzing philanthropic innovation may provide insights about business opportunities and notions related to social investments and profit. That aspect includes the link between those strategic decisions that a firm can use to maximize those investments as it was part of their core business. It also proves the existing link between CSR and innovation, and the possibilities that the enterprises have towards this subject.

Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier Business School

As a specific component of Corporate Social Responsibility, philanthropy can impact strongly the ability of an organization to change and innovate on diverse aspects, a subject for which only a few researches have attended in the academic literature. This investigation proposes to explore the existing link between a strategic conception of philanthropy and innovation. Indeed, the nature of the research question relies on an unexplored field in the CSR and Innovation management academic literature. It starts with the interest to know which the benefits are for a firm encouraged to invest strategically in philanthropy. In this regard, the analysis contributes in fitting this gap by following different objectives in an exploratory perspective. Throughout the research it will be analyzed the concept and the current and past contributions on the different branches of innovation (product innovation, managerial innovation, technological innovation), to accentuate the relation between an accurate strategic approach to philanthropy and the impact on the organizational value. Indeed, analyzing philanthropic innovation may provide insights about business opportunities and notions related to social investments and profit. That aspect includes the link between those strategic decisions that a firm can use to maximize those investments as it was part of their core business. It also proves the existing link between CSR and innovation, and the possibilities that the enterprises have towards this subject.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/10308

Idioma(s)

spa

Publicador

Facultad de administración

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

instname:Universidad del Rosario

reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR

Anheier, H. K., Simmons, A., & Winder, D. (2007). Innovation in strategic philanthropy : local and global perspectives / edited by Helmut K. Anheier, Adele Simmons, David Winder. New York : Springer, 2007.

Bajde, D. (2013). Marketized philanthropy: Kiva’s utopian ideology of entrepreneurial philanthropy. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 3-18.

Birkinshaw, J.M., Hamel G. & Mol. M. 2008. Management Innovation. Academy of Management Review. 33(4): 825-845.

Bocquet, R., & Mothe, C. (2011). Exploring the relationship between CSR and innovation: A comparison between small and large-sized French companies. (English). Revue Sciences De Gestion, (80), 101-119.

Bansal & Goyal (2009); Finger On The Pulse, at Last: Jeff Immelt, John Flannery. Forbes Magazine website

Blowfield M. and Frynas G. (2005); Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world; Chathamhouse Organization

Bos-Browers H.E.J., 2010, ‘Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice’, Business Strategy and the Environment,19, 7, 417–435.

Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. (2014). Who Needs CSR? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on National Competitiveness. Journal Of Business Ethics,119(3), 349-364. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1633-2.

Burke, L. & Logsdon (1996), J.M.. Corporate Social Responsibility ,Pays Off, Long Range Planning, Volume 29, Number 4, August 1996.

Carrigan, M.: 1997, ‘The Great Corporate Give-Away – Can Marketing Do Good for the ‘Do-Gooders’?’, European Business Journal 9(4), 40–46.

Carroll A.B. (1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, 34, p.39-48.

Charitou C. & Markides C. (2003); Responses to Disruptive Strategic Innovation. Sloan Management Review 44(2): 55-63

Chase, K. J., & Brokaw, S. C. (2013). Does Corporate Philanthropy Generate Shareholder Wealth? Effects of Philanthropy on Brand Equity and Financial Performance. Ethics & Critical Thinking Journal, 2013(2), 17.

Chung-Shing, L., Berniker, E., Van Wyhe, G., & Johnson, K. J. (2007). E-commerce disruptive innovations in charity and non-profit fund raising. Journal Of Strategic E-Commerce, 5(1&2), 39-60.

Cojocariu, C. (2011). CHALLENGES FOR THE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; GREEN LOGISTICS. Quality - Access To Success, 10.

Downey, Jim (2007); Innovation management; Topic Gateway Series No. 38; Technical Information Service

Ellis, Tania (2010) ; Sustainable Business Success through Corporate Social Innovation, The European Financial Review, Sustainability.

Eellls, Richard (1960); The Meaning of Modern Business; New York; Columbia University Press.

Frederick W.C. (1994), From CSR1 to CSR2: The Maturing of Business-and-Society Thought, Business and Society, Vol.33, N°2, P.150-164.

Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York. The New York Times Company.

Frumkin, P. (2006). Strategic giving recurso electrónico the art and science of philanthropy / Peter Frumkin. Chicago University of Chicago Press 2006.

Gabriel Y (1995) The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivity. Organization Studies 16(3): 477–501.

Galbreath J. (2006), Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations, Corporate Governance, Vol.6, p.175-187.

GE Annual Report; (2007); Invest and Deliver, Every Day; General Electric Website

GE Citizenship; (2012); A commitment to sustainable improvements in infant survival rates; General Electric.

GE Citizenship; (2014a); Creating Shareholder Value; The Role of Capital Markets, Solving Problems, Corporate Social Responsibility; General Electric website:

GE Citizenship; (2014b); Focus areas; Community Engagement; Health

GE Foundation, (2014); Developing futures in education, History, General Electric

GE, Global Impact Report; 2012; General Electric Website

GE Healthcare, (2010); Healthyimagination Investor Update; John Dineen, President and CEO of GE Healthcare.

GE; Sustainable Growth Report; 2012; General Electric Website

GE Fact Sheet, (2014); About, GE Imagination at work; General Electric website

Georgantzas, N. C., & Shapiro, H. J. 1993. Viable theoretical forms of synchronous production innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 11: 161–183

Godfrey, P. (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Brigham Young University.

Hart, S.: 2005, Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s most Difficult Problems (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

Govindarajan, Vijay (2009); What is reverse innovation; Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth web site.

Gummesson, E. (1988); Qualitative methods in management research; Lund, Norway: Studentlitteratur, Chartwell-Bratt

Gunther, Mark (2008); How GE gives away its money, CNN Money, Fortune Magazine website

Harrow, J., & Jung, T. (2011). Philanthropy is Dead; Long Live Philanthropy?. Public Management Review, 13(8)

Harvey C, Maclean M, Gordon J and Shaw E (2011) Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. Business History 53(3): 425–450

Hart, S. and C. Christensen: 2002, ‘The Great Leap: Innovation from the Base of the Pyramid’, MIT Sloan Management Review (Fall), 51–56.

Katavić, I., & Kovačević, A. (2011). Integrating corporate social responsibility (csr) into business strategies and practice. Proceedings Of The International Scientific Conference, Juraj Dobrila University Of Pula, Department Of Economics & Tourism 'Dr. Mijo Mirkovic', 1451-1472.

Healthymagination, (2014); An overview, What is GE healthymagination?

Kisperska-Moroń, D., & Klosa, E. (2013). The Importance of Logistic Risk for Achieving Corporate Social Responsibility Goals in Supply Chains. Logistics & Transport, (3), 27.

Lii, Y., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm. Journal Of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69-81.

Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Gordon, J. (2013). Social innovation, social entrepreneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 747-763

Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Talk the Walk: Measuring the Impact of Strategic Philanthropy. Journal Of Business Ethics, 100(3), 445-464.

Matute-Vallejo, J., Bravo, R., & Pina, J. M. (2011). The influence of corporate social responsibility and price fairness on customer behaviour: evidence from the financial sector. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 18(6), 317-331. doi:10.1002/csr.247

Mescon, T. S. & D. J. Tilson (1987) Corporate Philanthropy: A Strategic Approach to the Bottom-Line. California Management Review, 29, 49-61.

Minguela-Rata, B. (2011): “Product innovation: an empirical study into the impact of simultaneous engineering on new product quality”, Globalization,

Namin, K., EuiSik, C., Youngchan, K., & Moonkyu, L. (2011). Developing an effective strategic mix of corporate philanthropy. Service Industries Journal, 31(7).

Netemeyer et al. (2004); Developing and Validating Measures of facets of customer-based brand equity; Journal of Business Research; Vol 57 No 2; pp 209-224

Nick, L. (2010). The problem with a narrow-minded interpretation of csr: why csr has nothing to do with philanthropy. Ramon Llull Journal Of Applied Ethics, (1), 79-95.

Nicholls A (2006) Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Unsustainable Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pohle G. & Hittner J., (2008); Attaining sustainable growth through corporate social responsibility; IBM Global Business Services; IBM Institute for Business Value.

Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-69.

Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006), “Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility”,Harvard Business Review, December

Prahalad C(2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Wharton School Publishing

Prahalad, C. & Hart S. (1997). The Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business. 26, 2-14

Rana, S. (2013). Philanthropic innovation and creative capitalism: a historical and comparative perspective on social entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility. Alabama Law Review, 64(5), 1121-1174.

Reuters (2014); General Electric Co, Company Profile; Business; Reuters UK website

Ricks Jr. Joe M. (2002) The effects of strategic corporate philanthropy on consumer perceptions: an experimental assessment; Louisiana State University, 1-38

Sanzo, M., Alvarez, L., Rey, M., & Garcia, N. (2012). Perceptions of Top Management Commitment to Innovation and R&D-Marketing Relationship Effectiveness: Do They Affect CSR?. Annals Of Public And Cooperative Economics, 83(3), 383-405.

Saraf, V., Singhai, S., & Payasi, S. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility: Building Brand and Linking Corporate Strategy with Philanthropy. BVIMR Management Edge, 5(2), 88-97.

Sanchez, C. (2000); Motives for Corporate Philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and Political Legitimacy; The Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 363-375

Seul Ki, K., & Alcantara, L. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on organisational attractiveness across different cultures. International Employment Relations Review, 17(2), 37-54.

Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal Of Economics And Management Strategy, 16(3), 773-792.

Tham Jared (2013), Corrporate Social Innovation, New Business Paradigm, Lien Centre for Social Innovation

The Civic 50, (2014); The civic 50 organization, 2013 results

Tidd, J. & Besant J., (2009); Managing Innovation: Integrating technological market and organizational change; 5th edition.

USA Funds, (2008); Corporate investments in College Readiness and Access; Institute for Higher Education Policy.

Van de Ven A.H. & Poole M.S., 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20: 510-540

Varadarajan, P. Rajan and Anil Menon (1988), Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy, Journal of Marketing, 52 (July) 58-74.

Wharton – University of Pennsylvania; (2010); “Reverse Innovation”: GE makes India a Lab for Global Markets; Knowledge at Wharton, Health Economics.

WBCSD, (1998); CSR: Meeting changing expectations, World Business Council for Sustainable Development

WBCSD, (2004); Doing Business with the Poor: A Field Guide (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva).

TA

Palavras-Chave #Administración de empresas #Responsabilidad social de las empresas #Organización #658.408 #Sustainable development, Corporate Social Responsibility, Innovation, General Electric
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis

info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion