El trabajo en equipo en el Proceso Administrativo y de Compras en OPL Carga de Bucaramanga


Autoria(s): Silva Remolina, Maria Andrea
Contribuinte(s)

Piñeros-Espinosa, Rafael-Alejandro

Data(s)

09/06/2014

Resumo

El proceso administrativo y de compras de OPL Carga tiene algunas falencias entre ellas: fallas en la Comunicación entre el personal operativo, no se realizan llamadas internas usando con frecuencia el email, produciendo la saturación de solicitudes las cuales terminan sin ser resueltas en cuanto a roles se refiere, no hay enfoque de procesos en vista que no se tiene claras las tareas de cada cargo, adicionalmente no hay claridad en los subprocesos, perjudicando el proceso con el aumento de costos, pérdida de tiempo, las responsabilidades de los funcionario no todas las veces se ejecutan en el tiempo asignado, el liderazgo compartido presenta ambigüedades. Objetivos: Definir el trabajo en equipo en el proceso administrativo y de compras en OPL carga de Bucaramanga. La investigación que a realizar es de tipo descriptivo, busca descubrir las falencias o características que permiten diseñar y desarrollar un modelo de solución para los problemas del equipo de OPL Carga S.A.S. Materiales y métodos: La investigación efectuada es de tipo descriptivo, el objetivo es definir el modelo del trabajo en equipo y describir las falencias en el proceso administrativo y de compras en OPL carga de Bucaramanga, que permitan obtener un diagnóstico integral que conlleve a la implementación de estrategias de solución. Resultados: Se identificaron las falencias en los siguientes aspectos: Variable comunicación, rendimiento, destrezas complementarias, propósito significativo y meta específicas de los funcionarios en OPL carga sección administrativa. Conclusiones: El modelo de trabajo en equipo que OPL aplica es jerárquico, en el que se ofrece estabilidad, seguridad, se toman decisiones en forma piramidal, mediante la planeación de tareas, la colaboración, igualdad y respeto por los miembros, trabajando en pro de la solución de problemas. Se construyó un plano conceptual que permitió exponer la interpretación que la estudiante tiene de las teorías, investigaciones y antecedentes válidos para la comprensión del problema investigado. Área comunicacional: Coordinar acciones tendientes para que los funcionarios respondan a tiempo los emails atenientes a su trabajo. Área condiciones de trabajo: Clarificar y diseñar las reglas de comportamiento al interior de los equipos de trabajo que redunden en el mejoramiento del mismo y la búsqueda de soluciones oportunas. Área metas específicas: Procurar mediante auditorías el cumplimiento de las metas y objetivos propuestos por cada equipo de trabajo.

Universidad del Rosario

Problem: The administrative and shopping in OPL Charge process has some shortcomings including: failures in the communication between the operating staff, no calls are often done using email, causing saturation of requests which end without being resolved as refers to roles , no process approach given that there is no clear tasks for each position , no further clarity on the threads , damaging the process with increased costs, loss of time, no official responsibilities all times are run in the allotted time, shared leadership has ambiguities. Objectives: Define teamwork in the administrative process and shopping of OPL charge Bucaramanga. To conduct research that is descriptive, seeks to discover the flaws or features to design and develop a model solution to the problems of team OPL charge SAS Materials and methods: The research conducted is descriptive, the objective is to define the model of teamwork and describe the shortcomings in the administrative process and shopping in OPL charge Bucaramanga, leading to a comprehensive diagnosis that may lead to the implementation solution strategies. Results: Variable communication, performance, complementary skills, meaningful purpose and specific goal of officials in OPL charge administrative section: shortcomings in the following areas were identified. Conclusions: The model of teamwork that applies OPL is hierarchical, in which stability, security is provided, decisions are made in a pyramid, by planning tasks, collaboration, equality and respect for members, working for troubleshooting. A conceptual level that allowed expose the student has the interpretation of theories, research, and valid for understanding the research problem background was constructed. Communication Area: Coordinate activities designed for officials to respond to emails in accurate time to work. Area conditions: Clarify and design rules of behavior within work teams that result in improving the same and finding appropriate solutions. Area specific goals: Ensure compliance through audits of the goals and objectives proposed by each team.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/8692

Idioma(s)

spa

Publicador

Facultad de Administración

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR

instname:Universidad del Rosario

Adams J (1988) “The Role of the Creative Outlook in Team Building,” in Team Building: Brendan W., Reddy & Jamison, K., (Eds.) Virginia, Institute for Applied Behavioral Science and San Diego, California.

Ajay Kr S, Antony D. (2005) The Spirit of teamwork. Delhi Business Review. Vol. 6, No. 2, (July – December)

Alcover, C. M., Gil, F., & Barraza, A. (2004). Team learning: Adaptation of learning activities scales in a Spanish sample. [Aprendizaje de equipo: Adaptación en una muestra española de las escalas de actividades de aprendizaje] Psicothema, 16(3), 378-383.

Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. 2001. Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4): 645-663.

Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26: 512-529

Anderson N, West M. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-58.

Arnold J, Arad J & Drasgow F.(2000). The empowering Leadership Questionnaire: The construction and validation of a next scale for measuring leader.

Balkundi, P. y Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 49-68.

Barraycoa J, Lasaga O. (2010) La competencia de trabajo en equipo: más allá del corta y pega. Vivat Academia. N°111. Junio.

Barrick M, Bradley B, Kristof A, Colbert A.(2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 544-557.

Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert JM, Mount MK. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 377-391.

Barry, D. (1991) “Managing the Bossless Team: Lessons in Distributed Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics. Summer.

Bateman, A. (1990) Team Building: Developing a Productive Team, retrieved from Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J. y McLendon, C. L.(2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A metaanalytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.

Bell, S.( 2007). Deep–level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 92: 595-615.

Bommer, W. Johnson, J. Rich, G. Podsakoff, P, MacKenzie S. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, Vol 48: 587-605.

Borucki, CC, y Burke, MJ (1999). Un examen de los antecedentes relacionados con el servicio al rendimiento de la tienda minorista. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 943-962. Bugueño X, Barros C. (2008). Formación de equipos de trabajo colaborativo. Valoras UC Fichas.

Bunderson, J. Sutcliffe, K. (2002). Comparing alternate conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance. Academy of Management Journal, vol 45:875-893.

Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors is functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 288-307.

Burningham C, West M. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26, 106-117.

Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E, Volpe CE. 1995. Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In E. Salas (Ed)., Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations 333-380. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass

Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA. (2007). Shared leardership in teams: An investigation of antecedent condictions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1217 – 1234.

Chen, G. (2005). Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 101-116.

Chen, G. Kirkman, B. Kanfer, R. Allen, D. y Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331-346.

Cohen SG, Bailey DE. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.

Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter C, Ng KY. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.

de Jong, A., de Ruyter, K., & Lemmink, J. 2005. Service climate in self-managing teams: Mapping the linkage of team member perceptions and service performance outcomes in a business-to-business setting. Journal of Management Studies, 42(8): 1593-1620.

Desafíos de la educación. IIPE(2000).. Diez módulos destinados a los procesos de transformación educativa. Ministerio de Educación de la Nación, Buenos Aires.

Diseño tipos de estudio,( 2002). Recuperado de : http://www.uv.es/invsalud/invsalud/disenyo-tipo-estudio.htm

Driskell, J. & Salas, E. (1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34: 277-288.

Duarte, D.& Tennant, S. (1999) Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools and Techniques That Succeed. San Francisco.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.

Ellis, P. Bell, B. Ployhart, R. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, D(2005). An evaluation of generic team-work skills training with action teams: Effects on cognitive and skill-based out. Personnel Psychology, 58: 641 – 672.

Ellis, APJ, Bell BS, Ployhart, R. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Ilgen, D.R. (2005). An evaluation of generic teamwork skills training with action teams: effects on cognitive and skill-based outcomes. Personnel psychology, 58, 641-672.

Etzioni A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs NJ. : Prentice Hall.

Gibson, C & Cohen, S.G. (Eds.) (2003) Virtual Teams that Work. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Gilson, L. Mathieu, J. Shalley, C.& Ruddy, T. (2005). Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 521-531.

Gilson, L. Mathieu, J. Shalley, C. & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 521-531.

González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M. y Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of applied psychology, 87, 465-73.

Gruenfeld D, Mannix E. Williams K, & Neale, M. (1996) Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67 (1), 1-15.

Gully, S. Incalcaterra, K. Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 819-832.

Hackman J, Morris C. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in experimental social psychology, 8: 45 – 99.

Hackman JR, Wageman R. 2005. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30: 269-287.

Hannan M, & Freeman J. (1978). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5), 929-963.

Harrison D, Price K, Bell M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects and deep-level diversity on work group decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 96-107.

Harrison, D. Price, K. Gavin, J. & Florey, A.(2002). Time, teams and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1029-1045.

Hellriegel, et. al., (2001) Organizational Behavior, Singapore, South-Western Thomson Learning.

Hiller, N. Day, D. & Vance, R. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 387-397.

Hiriart I, Olivares L. (2004). Clima organizacional y Fortalecimiento del trabajo en Equipo. Diplomado en Salud Pública y Salud Familiar

Hollenbeck JR, DeRue DS, Guzzo R. (2004). Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training and team task design. Human Resource Management, 43, 353–366. Recuperado de http://humanresources.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=humanresources&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ianr.unl.edu%2Fpubs%2FMisc%2 Fcc352.htm%23te on 1st June, 2006.

Johnson D, Johnson R, Smith K (1994), Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Jung D, Sosik J. (1999). Effects of group characteristics on work group performance: A longitudinal investigation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3: 279-290.

Katzenbach J, Smith D. (1993) “The discipline of teams” Harvard Business Review. Pp. 111 – 120. (March - April).

Katzenbach J, Smith D. (1993) The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review. Pp. 111 – 120. (March - April)

Kennedy A, Nilson L. (2006).Successful strategies for teams. Published by the Office of Teaching Effectiveness and Innovation. Clemson University. Useen..

Kirkman BL, Rosen B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 58 – 74.

Kirkman, B. y Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58-74.

Knigth D, Durham C, Locke E. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 326 – 338.

Kozlowski S, Ilgen D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological.

Kozlowski, S. y Bell, B. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. En W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen y R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 333-375).Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Kozlowski, S. Gully, S. Nason, E. y Smith, E. (1999). Developing adaptative teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. En D. R. Ilgen y E. D. Pulatos (Eds.), The Changing Nature of Work and Performance: Implications for Staffing, Personnel Actions, and Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lester S, Meglino B, Korsgaard M. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 352-368.

Lester S, Meglino B, Korsgaard M. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 352-368.

Likert, R. New Patterns of Management. Mc Graw Hill, Nueva York, 1961-1967.

Marks, M. Mathieu, J. & Zaccaro, S. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 356-376.

Martínez M. (1998). Diseño de equipos de trabajo en las organizaciones actuals. Doctorado – , Psicología Social UAB.

Mathieu J, Maynard M, Rapp, T. & Gilson, L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997- 2007 : A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse into the Future. Journal of Management, 34 (3), 410-476.

Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp, T. & Gilson, L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997- 2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse into the Future. Journal of Management, 34 (3), 410-476.

Mayer, R. Davis, J. & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709-734.

McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McIntyre R, Salas E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R.A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds). , Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations.. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

Mejía Lopera C, Rodríguez Monsalve JM. (2005). La comunicación como elemento de fortalecimiento organizacional. Universidad de Antioquia. p.9

Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: What differences make a difference in team performance? Small Group Research, 34: 651-677.

Morgeson, F. Reider, M. & Campion, M. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristic, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58: 583-611.

Neal A, Griffin MA. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91. p 946 – 953.

Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S., & Christiansen, N. (1999). The relationship between workteam personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organizational Management, 24: 28-45

Paulus, P. B.(2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology—An International Review—Psychologie Appliquee—Revue Internationale, 49(2): 237-262.

Peiró J. (1997). Psicología de la organización. Madrid UNEM

Perretti F, Negro G. (2007). Mixing genres and matching people: A study of innovation and team composition in Hollywood. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28: 563-586.

Pirola-Merlo, A., Hartel, C., Mann, L. y Hirst, G. (2002). How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 561-581.

Prichard, J. S., Stratford, R. J. and Bizo, L. A. (2006), Team-Skills Training Enhances Collaborative Learning. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 256-265.

Pritchard, R. D. (1995). Lessons learned about ProMES. In R. D. Pritchard (Ed.), Productivity measurement and improvement: Organizational case studies: 325-365. New York: Praeger.

Purser, R. and Cabana, S. (1999) The Self-Managing Organization: How Leading Companies Are Transforming the Work of Teams for Real Impact. New York, Free Press.

Pyatt, J. Elizabeth. (2005) Building Blocks for Teams: Why Teams? – The Benefits, Teaching and Learning with Technology, Penn State University retrieved from. Recuperado de http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/teams/student/benefits.html

Reed M (1996). Organizational Theorizing: a historically contested terrain en Clegg, SR; Hardy, C and Nord, WR (ed). Handbook of organization studies.

Rico R, Alcove de la Hera C, Tabernero C. (1999) Efectividad de los Equipos de Trabajo, una Revisión de la Última Década de Investigación. 1999-2009.

Robbins, P.S. and Sanghi, S. (2006) Organizational Behavior, Delhi, Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Rose, E. and Buckley, S. (1999) 50 Ways to Teach Your Learner: Activities and Interventions for Building High- Performance Teams, San Francisco, Jossey- Bass.

Rousseau V, Aube C, Savoie A. (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37(5), 540-570.

Salanova, M. y Peiró, J.M. (2003).Bloque II. Comportamiento organizacional Tema 3. El trabajo en equipo. Tratado de Psicología del Trabajo. Vol. II. Aspectos psicosociales del trabajo. p. 137-160. Madrid: Síntesis; y Alcover, C.M. Cardona P, Wilkinson H. Trabajo en equipo.

Schneider, B., Ehrhart, MG, Mayer, DM, Saltz, JL, y Niles-Jolly, K. (2005). Entender tintas organización del cliente en la configuración del servicio. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1017-1032.

Scholtes, Peter, (1988). The Team Handbook: How to Use Teams to Improve Quality. Madison.

Scholtes, P. (1999) Cómo liderar: Manual Práctico. Bogotá: McGraw Hill Interamericana. S.A.

Scott WC. (1067). Organization Theory. Homewood IL: Irwin.

Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 332-349.

Shea GP, Guzzo RA. (1987). Groups as human resources. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research

Sisto, V. (2002). Teoría Psicológica en Acción: La Psicología Frente a las Consecuencias Psicológicas y Sociales de los Procesos de Flexibilización Laboral. Psicoperspectivas, 1, p.111-123.

Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1239-1251.

Stein, M. I. (1974). Stimulating creativity, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

Steizel S. (2005) El trabajo en equipos multiculturales: particularidades y mecanismos organizaciones para facilitarlos. 7° Congreso Nacional de estudios del trabajo. Asociación Argentina de especialistas en estudios del trabajo. Universidad de San Andrés.

Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L. and Jochems, W. M. G. (2004), Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 403–424.

Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the hawthorne studies to the work teams of the 1990s. Group Dynamics, 4, 44-67.

Taggar S, Hackett R, Saha S. (1999).Leadershipp emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 52: 899-926.

Tena J. (1989). Organización de la empresa. Teoría y aplicaciones. EADA Gestión.

Tesluk PE, Farr JL, Klein SR. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31: 27-41.

Tesluk, P. E. y Mathieu, J. E. (1999). Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 200-217.

Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M., & West, M. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group & Organization Management, 29: 540-559.

Tsoukas H, Chia R. (2002). On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582.

Tuckman BW. (1965). “Development sequences in small Group” BW Psychological Bulletin. June. 65.

Ursiny, T., O’ Hagan, C.A.C., Kay, A.B. (2004) Team Facilitation-Highly effective Teams are Critical to Organizational Success, ACT (Advantage Coaching & Training) Inc. 490 E. Roosevelt Rd., (2006). Suite 102 West Chicago, IL 60185 retrieved from http://www.advantagecoaching.com/team_facilitation.aspx on 25th June,

Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27: 141-162.

Welbourne TM, Johnson DE, Erez A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 540- 555. Wells (2002),

WI, (2000) Textbook for GEEN 1400: First-Year Engineering Projects and GEEN 2830: Innovation and Invention, Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA Teamwork and Working in Teams Joiner Associates, Introductory Engineering Design pp. 2-7. Disponible en http://itll.colorado.edu/images/uploads/courses_workshops/geen1400/textbook/ch06teamwork_and_working_in_teams.pdf

Yang J, Mossholder KW, Peng TK. (2007). Procedural justice climate and group power distance: An examination of cross – level interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology. 92. p 681 – 692.

Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 12: 451-483.

Zohar D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85. p 587-596.

Zornoza, A, Salanova, M y Peiró, JM. (1996).Trabajo en grupo. En J.M. Peiró y F. Prieto (Eds.). Tratado de Psicología del Trabajo. Vol. II. Aspectos psicosociales del trabajo. p.137-160.

TA

Palavras-Chave #OPL Carga #Administración de empresas #Administración de personal #Equipos de trabajo #658.3 #Administration #Communication #Teams #Performance #goals
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis