The impact of nurse-directed protocolised-weaning from mechanical ventilation on nursing practice: A quasi-experimental study


Autoria(s): Blackwood, Bronagh; Wilson-Barnett, J.
Data(s)

01/02/2007

Resumo

Background: <br/>Internationally, nurse-directed protocolised-weaning has been evaluated by measuring its impact on patient outcomes. The impact on nurses’ views and perceptions has been largely ignored.<br/><br/>Aim:<br/>To determine the change in intensive care nurses’ perceptions, satisfaction, knowledge and attitudes following the introduction of nurse-directed weaning. Additionally, views were obtained on how useful protocolised-weaning was to practice.<br/><br/>Methods:<br/>The sample comprised nurses working in general intensive care units in three university-affiliated hospitals. Nurse-directed protocolised-weaning was implemented in one unit (intervention group); two ICUs continued with usual doctor-led practice (control group). Nurses’ perceptions, satisfaction, knowledge and attitudes were measured by self-completed questionnaires before (Phase I) and after the implementation of nurse-directed weaning (Phase II) in all units.<br/><br/>Results:<br/>Response rates were 79% (n=140n=140) for Phase 1 and 62% (n=132n=132) for Phase II. Regression-based analyses showed that changes from Phase I to Phase II were not significantly different between the intervention and control groups. Sixty-nine nurses responded to both Phase I and II questionnaires. In the intervention group, these nurses scored their mean perceived level of knowledge higher in Phase II (6.39 vs 7.17, p=0.01p=0.01). In the control group, role perception (4.41 vs 4.22, p=0.01p=0.01) was lower and, perceived knowledge (6.03 vs 6.63, p=0.04p=0.04), awareness of weaning plans (6.09 vs 7.06, p=0.01p=0.01) and satisfaction with communication (5.28 vs 6.19, p=0.01p=0.01) were higher in Phase II. The intervention group found protocolised weaning useful in their practice (75%): this was scored significantly higher by junior and senior nurses than middle grade nurses (p=0.02p=0.02).<br/><br/>Conclusion<br/><br/>We conclude that nurse-directed protocolised-weaning had no effect on nurses’ views and perceptions due to the high level of satisfaction which encouraged nurses’ participation in weaning throughout. Control group changes are attributed to a ‘reactive effect’ from being study participants. Weaning protocols provide a uniform method of weaning practice and are particularly beneficial in providing safe guidance for junior staff.<br/>

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/the-impact-of-nursedirected-protocolisedweaning-from-mechanical-ventilation-on-nursing-practice-a-quasiexperimental-study(9458c3d4-bfed-471a-85b9-e2591e9ad633).html

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.031

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/ws/files/3641439/Blackwood_1_s2.0_S0020748905002555_main.pdf

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846398830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Blackwood , B & Wilson-Barnett , J 2007 , ' The impact of nurse-directed protocolised-weaning from mechanical ventilation on nursing practice: A quasi-experimental study ' International Journal of Nursing Studies , vol 44 , no. 2 , pp. 209-226 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.031

Palavras-Chave #clinical nursing research #evaluation studies #practice guidelines #Ventilator weaning #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700 #Medicine(all) #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2900 #Nursing(all) #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3306 #Health(social science)
Tipo

article