Taxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer.


Autoria(s): Piccart-Gebhart, Martine; Burzykowski, T.; Buyse, Marc; Sledge, G.; Carmichael, J.; Luck, H. J.; Mackey, John R; Nabholtz, J.M.; Paridaens, Robert; Biganzoli, Laura; Jassem, J.; Bontenbal, M; Bonneterre, J; Chan, S; Basaran, Gul; Therasse, P.
Data(s)

01/04/2008

Resumo

PURPOSE: Taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) have been sequenced or combined with anthracyclines (doxorubicin or epirubicin) for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. This meta-analysis uses data from all relevant trials to detect any advantages of taxanes in terms of tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data were collected on eight randomized combination trials comparing anthracyclines + taxanes (+ cyclophosphamide in one trial) with anthracyclines + cyclophosphamide (+ fluorouracil in four trials), and on three single-agent trials comparing taxanes with anthracyclines. Combination trials included 3,034 patients; single-agent trials included 919 patients. RESULTS: Median follow-up of living patients was 43 months, median survival was 19.3 months, and median PFS was 7.1 months. In single-agent trials, response rates were similar in the taxanes (38%) and in the anthracyclines (33%) arms (P = .08). The hazard ratios for taxanes compared with anthracyclines were 1.19 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.36; P = .011) for PFS and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P = .90) for survival. In combination trials, response rates were 57% (10% complete) in taxane-based combinations and 46% (6% complete) in control arms (P < .001). The hazard ratios for taxane-based combinations compared with control arms were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99; P = .031) for PFS and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.03; P = .24) for survival. CONCLUSION: Taxanes were significantly worse than single-agent anthracyclines in terms of PFS, but not in terms of response rates or survival. Taxane-based combinations were significantly better than anthracycline-based combinations in terms of response rates and PFS, but not in terms of survival.

Journal Article

Meta-Analysis

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Formato

No full-text files

Identificador

uri/info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8399

uri/info:pii/26/12/1980

uri/info:pmid/18421049

http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/55801

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Journal of clinical oncology, 26 (12

Palavras-Chave #Sciences bio-médicales et agricoles #Anthracyclines -- administration & dosage #Anthracyclines -- therapeutic use #Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols -- therapeutic use #Breast Neoplasms -- drug therapy #Breast Neoplasms -- pathology #Disease-Free Survival #Female #Humans #Neoplasm Metastasis #Proportional Hazards Models #Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic #Survival Rate #Taxoids -- administration & dosage #Taxoids -- therapeutic use
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:ulb-repo/semantics/articlePeerReview

info:ulb-repo/semantics/openurl/article