A feasibility study evaluating docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer


Autoria(s): Di Leo, Angelo; Crown, John; Nogaret, Jean-Marie; Duffy, Karen E.; Bartholomeus, Sylvie; Dolci, Stella; Rowan, Susan; O'Higgins, Niall J. O.; Paesmans, Marianne; Larsimont, Denis; Riva, Angelo; Piccart-Gebhart, Martine
Data(s)

01/02/2000

Resumo

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Docetaxel is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapies for patients with node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three consecutive groups of patients with node-positive breast cancer or locally-advanced disease, aged < or = 70 years, received one of the following regimens: a) sequential A-->T-->CMF: doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 q 3 weeks x 3, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 q 3 weeks x 3, followed by i.v. CMF days 1 + 8 q 4 weeks x 3; b) sequential accelerated A-->T-->CMF: A and T were administered at the same doses q 2 weeks; c) combination therapy: doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q 3 weeks x 4, followed by CMF x 4. When indicated, radiotherapy was administered during or after CMF, and tamoxifen started after the end of CMF. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients have been treated. Median age was 48 years. A 30% rate of early treatment discontinuation was observed in patients receiving the sequential accelerated therapy (23% during A-->T), due principally to severe skin toxicity. Median relative dose-intensity was 100% in the three treatment arms. The incidence of G3-G4 major toxicities by treated patients, was as follows: skin toxicity a: 5%; b: 27%; c: 0%; stomatitis a: 20%; b: 20%; c: 3%. The incidence of neutropenic fever was a: 30%; b: 13%; c: 48%. After a median follow-up of 18 months, no late toxicity has been reported. CONCLUSIONS: The accelerated sequential A-->T-->CMF treatment is not feasible due to an excess of skin toxicity. The sequential non accelerated and the combination regimens are feasible and under evaluation in a phase III trial of adjuvant therapy.

Clinical Trial

Comparative Study

Journal Article

Multicenter Study

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Formato

No full-text files

Identificador

uri/info:doi/10.1023/A:1008345432342

uri/info:pmid/10761751

local/VX-005571

http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/55282

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Annals of oncology, 11 (2

Palavras-Chave #Sciences bio-médicales et agricoles #Adult #Aged #Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic -- administration & dosage #Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols -- administration & dosage #Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols -- adverse effects #Breast Neoplasms -- drug therapy #Breast Neoplasms -- mortality #Breast Neoplasms -- pathology #Breast Neoplasms -- surgery #Chemotherapy, Adjuvant #Confidence Intervals #Cyclophosphamide -- administration & dosage #Dose-Response Relationship, Drug #Doxorubicin -- administration & dosage #Drug Administration Schedule #Feasibility Studies #Female #Fluorouracil -- administration & dosage #Follow-Up Studies #Humans #Lymphatic Metastasis #Methotrexate -- administration & dosage #Middle Aged #Neoplasm Staging #Paclitaxel -- administration & dosage #Paclitaxel -- analogs & derivatives #Survival Rate #Taxoids #Treatment Outcome
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:ulb-repo/semantics/articlePeerReview

info:ulb-repo/semantics/openurl/article