National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Coastal Ecosystem Assessment Program: a manual of methods


Autoria(s): Messick, Gretchen A.; Jacobs, John M.; Brush, Julianna R.; McLaughlin, Shawn M.; Leight, A.K.; Rhodes, Matt R.; Howard, Dorothy H.; Gonsalves, Lonnie; Lewis, Earl J.
Data(s)

01/06/2013

Resumo

Environmental managers strive to preserve natural resources for future generations but have limited decision-making tools to define ecosystem health. Many programs offer relevant broad-scale, environmental policy information on regional ecosystem health. These programs provide evidence of environmental condition and change, but lack connections between local impacts and direct effects on living resources. To address this need, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Ocean Service (NOAA/NOS) Cooperative Oxford Laboratory (COL), in cooperation with federal, state, and academic partners, implemented an integrated biotic ecosystem assessment on a sub-watershed 14-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUD) scale in Chesapeake Bay. The goals of this effort were to 1) establish a suite of bioindicators that are sensitive to ecosystem change, 2) establish the effects of varying land-use patterns on water quality and the subsequent health of living resources, 3) communicate these findings to local decision-makers, and 4) evaluate the success of management decisions in these systems. To establish indicators, three sub-watersheds were chosen based on statistical analysis of land-use patterns to represent a gradient from developed to agricultural. The Magothy (developed), Corsica (agricultural), and Rhode (reference) Rivers were identified. A random stratified design was developed based on depth (2m contour) and river mile. Sampling approaches were coordinated within this structure to allow for robust system comparisons. The sampling approach was hierarchal, with metrics chosen to represent a range from community to cellular level responses across multiple organisms. This approach allowed for the identification of sub-lethal stressors, and assessment of their impact on the organism and subsequently the population. Fish, crabs, clams, oysters, benthic organisms, and bacteria were targeted, as each occupies a separate ecological niche and may respond dissimilarly to environmental stressors. Particular attention was focused on the use of pathobiology as a tool for assessing environmental condition. By integrating the biotic component with water quality, sediment indices, and land- use information, this holistic evaluation of ecosystem health will provide management entities with information needed to inform local decision-making processes and establish benchmarks for future restoration efforts.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://aquaticcommons.org/14668/1/NOS%20NCCOS%20169.pdf

Messick, Gretchen A. and Jacobs, John M. and Brush, Julianna R. and McLaughlin, Shawn M. and Leight, A.K. and Rhodes, Matt R. and Howard, Dorothy H. and Gonsalves, Lonnie and Lewis, Earl J. (2013) National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Coastal Ecosystem Assessment Program: a manual of methods. Oxford, MD, NOAA/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, 123pp. (NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS , 169)

Idioma(s)

en

Publicador

NOAA/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science

Relação

http://aquaticcommons.org/14668/

Palavras-Chave #Biology #Ecology #Education #Fisheries
Tipo

Monograph or Serial Issue

NonPeerReviewed