Are Individualism and “Masculinity” Related When Controlling for Regional Proximity? A Reappraisal of Barry (2015)


Autoria(s): Bain, Paul G.; Bongiorno, Renata
Data(s)

30/08/2015

Resumo

Barry recently attributed the non-significant relationship between the cultural dimensions of Individualism (IND) and Masculinity (MASC) to a suppression effect of regional differences. Pairing countries on regional proximity, he showed that a strong correlation between these cultural dimensions emerged. However, we point to significant issues with this analysis, including how countries were paired, ordered, and included/excluded, as well as in the cultural meaningfulness of regional proximity. Re-analysis of the data after addressing these issues shows that IND and MASC were not significantly related at a cultural level after controlling for regional proximity, nor after controlling for two other prominent geographic factors: latitude and climate demands. The weight of evidence suggests that IND and MASC are not correlated at a cultural level.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/87089/

Publicador

Sage Publications, Inc.

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/87089/1/BainBongiorno-INDMASC-ACCEPTED.pdf

DOI:10.1177/0022022115603126

Bain, Paul G. & Bongiorno, Renata (2015) Are Individualism and “Masculinity” Related When Controlling for Regional Proximity? A Reappraisal of Barry (2015). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. (In Press)

Direitos

© The Author(s) 2015

Fonte

Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; School of Psychology & Counselling

Palavras-Chave #170113 Social and Community Psychology #culture #values #individualism #masculinity
Tipo

Journal Article