Comparison of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate (Actifuse®) with rhBMP-2 (Infuse®) in posterolateral instrumented lumbar fusion

Study Design This was a randomised controlled trial in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) who underwent instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the bone grafting substitute, silicate-substituted calcium phosphate (SiCaP) compared with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) and to evaluate clinical outcomes over a period of two years. Methods Patients undergoing PLF surgery for DDD at a single centre were recruited and randomised to one of two groups; SiCaP (n=9) or rhBMP-2 (n=10). One patient withdrew prior to randomisation and another from the rhBMP-2 group after randomisation. The radiological and clinical outcomes were examined and compared. Fusion was assessed at 12 months with computed tomography (CT) and plain radiographs. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by recording measures of pain, quality of life, disability and neurological status from six weeks to two years postoperatively. Results In the SiCaP and rhBMP-2 groups, fusion was observed in 9/9 and 8/9 patients respectively. Pain and disability scores were reduced and quality of life increased in both groups. Leg pain, disability and satisfaction scores were similar between the groups at each postoperative time point, however, back pain was less at six weeks and quality of life was higher at six months in the SiCaP group than the rhBMP-2 group. Conclusions SiCaP and rhBMP-2 were comparable in terms of achieving successful bone growth and fusion. Both groups similarly alleviated pain and improved quality of life, neurological, satisfaction and return to work outcomes following PLF surgery.