Commentary on the article by Swanenburg et al. ‘Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G)’


Autoria(s): Gabel, Charles Philip; Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I.; Osborne, Jason W.; Melloh, Markus
Data(s)

2014

Resumo

We commend Swanenburg et al. (2013) on translation, development, and clinimetric analysis of the NDI-G. However, the dual-factor structure with factor analysis and the high level of internal consistency (IC) highlighted in their discussion were not emphasized in the abstract or conclusion. These points may imply some inconsistencies with the final conclusions since determination of stable point estimates with the study's small sample are exceedingly difficult.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/85536/

Publicador

Churchill Livingston

Relação

DOI:10.1016/j.math.2013.10.007

Gabel, Charles Philip, Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I., Osborne, Jason W., & Melloh, Markus (2014) Commentary on the article by Swanenburg et al. ‘Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G)’. Manual Therapy, 19(1), e1-e2.

Direitos

Copyright 2014 Elsevier

Fonte

School of Clinical Sciences; Faculty of Health

Tipo

Journal Article