Should the court direct that costs ordered to be recovered on the indemnity basis be assessed by reference to a costs agreement between the successful party and their solicitors?


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl
Data(s)

01/11/2006

Resumo

The decision in Hook v Boreham & QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2006] QDC 304 considered whether the court should go further than order that costs be assessed on the indemnity basis, but should also specify the basis by which those indemnity costs should be determined. The decision makes it clear that under r704(3) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, questions of that nature are ordinarily preserved to the discretion of the Registrar.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/73127/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc.

Relação

http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor

Jackson, Sheryl (2006) Should the court direct that costs ordered to be recovered on the indemnity basis be assessed by reference to a costs agreement between the successful party and their solicitors? Proctor, 26(10), pp. 42-43.

Direitos

Copyright 2006 The author

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #costs ordered on indemnity basis #whether court should, or could, make orders about basis of assessment
Tipo

Journal Article