Costs - solicitor's retainer on 'no win, no fee' basis - meaning of 'win' - solicitor not entitled to recover excess of costs over amount paid on settlement - no consideration for variation of oral retainer.


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl
Data(s)

01/09/2002

Resumo

In Baker Johnson Lawyers v Jorgensen [2002] QDC 205 McGill DCJ considered the meaning of a 'no win, no fee' retainer and concluded that, in the absence of qualification by agreement, solicitors retained on that basis were not entitled to recover costs exceeding the amount of any judgment or settlement.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/72684/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc.

Relação

http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor

Jackson, Sheryl (2002) Costs - solicitor's retainer on 'no win, no fee' basis - meaning of 'win' - solicitor not entitled to recover excess of costs over amount paid on settlement - no consideration for variation of oral retainer. Proctor, 22(8), p. 29.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #solicitor's retainer on 'no win no fee' basis #meaning of 'win' #whether entitlement to recover excess of costs over settlement amount
Tipo

Journal Article