Why is there no genetics in phylogenetics : misconceptions, clarification and solutions


Autoria(s): Scharaschkin, Tanya
Data(s)

2013

Resumo

Fundamental misconceptions regarding some basic phylogenetic terminology are presented in this opinion piece. An attempt is made to point out why these misconceptions exist and what may be causing the misapplication of terminology. Clarification is providing via basic definitions and simple explanations. Differences between the scientific fields of genetics and population genetics are discussed. The appropriate use of terminology is advocated and alternative terms are proposed to eliminate one potential source of confusion. It is suggested we use 'sequence data' instead of molecular data and 'non-sequence data' instead of morphological data in the field of phylogenetics and systematics.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/65241/

Publicador

Royal Society of Queensland

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/65241/4/65241.pdf

http://search.informit.com.au/browsePublication;vol=118;py=2013;res=IELHSS;issn=0080-469X

Scharaschkin, Tanya (2013) Why is there no genetics in phylogenetics : misconceptions, clarification and solutions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland, 118, pp. 63-67.

Direitos

Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Queensland

Fonte

School of Earth, Environmental & Biological Sciences; Science & Engineering Faculty

Palavras-Chave #Phylogenetic Terminology #Misconceptions #Genetics #Population Genetics #Sequence Data #Non-Sequence Data
Tipo

Journal Article