A randomised, concentration-controlled, comparison of standard (5-day) vs. prolonged (15-day) infusions of etoposide phosphate in small-cell lung cancer


Autoria(s): Joel, S.; O'Byrne, Kenneth J.; Penson, R.; Papamichael, D.; Higgins, A.; Robertshaw, H.; Rudd, R.; Talbot, D.; Slevin, M.
Data(s)

1998

Resumo

Purpose: This randomised trial was designed to investigate the activity and toxicity of continuous infusion etoposide phosphate (EP), targeting a plasma etoposide concentration of either 3 μg/ml for five days (5d) or 1 μg/ml for 15 days (15d), in previously untreated SCLC patients with extensive disease. Patients and methods: EP was used as a single agent. Plasma etoposide concentration was monitored on days 2 and 4 in patients receiving 5d EP and on days 2, 5, 8 and 11 in patients receiving 15d EP, with infusion modification to ensure target concentrations were achieved. Treatment was repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles, with a 25% reduction in target concentration in patients with toxicity. Results: The study has closed early after entry of 29 patients (14 with 5d EP, 15 with 15d EP). Objective responses were seen in seven of 12 (58%, confidence interval (CI): 27%-85%) evaluable patients after 5d EP, and two of 14 (14%, CI: 4%42%) evaluable patients after 15d EP (P = 0.038). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or leucopenia during the first cycle of treatment was observed in six of 12 patients after 5d EP and 0/14 patients after 15d EP (P = 0.004), with median nadir WBC count of 2.6 x 109/1 after 5d and 5.0 x 109/1 after 15d EP (P = 0.017). Only one of 49 cycles of 15d EP was associated with grade 3 or worse haematological toxicity, compared to 14 of 61 cycles of 5d EP. Conclusions: Although the number of patients entered into this trial was small, the low activity seen at 1 μg/ml in the 15d arm suggests that this concentration is below the therapeutic window in this setting. Further concentration- controlled studies with prolonged EP infusions are required.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/65126/

Publicador

Oxford University Press

Relação

DOI:10.1023/A:1008437805286

Joel, S., O'Byrne, Kenneth J., Penson, R., Papamichael, D., Higgins, A., Robertshaw, H., Rudd, R., Talbot, D., & Slevin, M. (1998) A randomised, concentration-controlled, comparison of standard (5-day) vs. prolonged (15-day) infusions of etoposide phosphate in small-cell lung cancer. Annals of Oncology, 9(11), pp. 1205-1211.

Direitos

Copyright 1998 Oxford University Press

Fonte

School of Biomedical Sciences; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation

Palavras-Chave #Concentration-controlled #Etoposide #Randomised #Small-cell lung cancer #cyclophosphamide #doxorubicin #etopofos #vincristine #adult #aged #article #blood toxicity #clinical article #clinical trial #concentration response #controlled study #dose response #dose time effect relation #drug blood level #female #human #human cell #human tissue #intravenous drug administration #leukopenia #lung small cell cancer #male #neutropenia #priority journal #randomized controlled trial #Antineoplastic Agents #Carcinoma #Small Cell #Drug Administration Schedule #Humans #Lung Neoplasms #Middle Aged #Organophosphorus Compounds
Tipo

Journal Article