Comparison between electrically-evoked and voluntary wrist movements on sensorimotor and prefrontal cortical activation : A multi-channel time domain fNIRS study


Autoria(s): Muthalib, M.; Re, R.; Zucchelli, L.; Perry, S.; Contini, D.; Caffini, M.; Spinelli, L.; Kerr, G.K.; Torricelli, A.
Data(s)

01/11/2013

Resumo

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been consistently demonstrated to improve skeletal muscle function in neurological populations with movement disorders, such as poststroke and incomplete spinal cord injury (Vanderthommen and Duchateau, 2007). Recent research has documented that rapid, supraspinal central nervous system reorganisation/neuroplastic mechanisms are also implicated during NMES (Chipchase et al., 2011). Functional neuroimaging studies have shown NMES to activate a network of sub-cortical and cortical brain regions, including the sensorimotor (SMC) and prefrontal (PFC) cortex (Blickenstorfer et al., 2009; Han et al., 2003; Muthalib et al., 2012). A relationship between increase in SMC activation with increasing NMES current intensity up to motor threshold has been previously reported using functional MRI (Smith et al., 2003). However, since clinical neurorehabilitation programmes commonly utilise NMES current intensities above the motor threshold and up to the maximum tolerated current intensity (MTI), limited research has determined the cortical correlates of increasing NMES current intensity at or above MTI (Muthalib et al., 2012). In our previous study (Muthalib et al., 2012), we assessed contralateral PFC activation using 1-channel functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during NMES of the elbow flexors by increasing current intensity from motor threshold to greater than MTI and showed a linear relationship between NMES current intensity and the level of PFC activation. However, the relationship between NMES current intensity and activation of the motor cortical network, including SMC and PFC, has not been clarified. Moreover, it is of scientific and clinical relevance to know how NMES affects the central nervous system, especially in comparison to voluntary (VOL) muscle activation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to utilise multi-channel time domain fNIRS to compare SMC and PFC activation between VOL and NMESevoked wrist extension movements.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/64613/

Publicador

IRSTEA – France Institut National de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l’environnement et l’agriculture.

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/64613/4/64613.pdf

http://www.icnirs2013.org/?page_id=2234

Muthalib, M., Re, R., Zucchelli, L., Perry, S., Contini, D., Caffini, M., Spinelli, L., Kerr, G.K., & Torricelli, A. (2013) Comparison between electrically-evoked and voluntary wrist movements on sensorimotor and prefrontal cortical activation : A multi-channel time domain fNIRS study. In Proceedings of the NIR 2013 : 16th International Conference on Near Infrared Spectroscopy, IRSTEA – France Institut National de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l’environnement et l’agriculture., La Grande-Motte, France, pp. 349-351.

Direitos

Copyright 2013 IRSTEA – France

Fonte

Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences

Palavras-Chave #110603 Motor Control #110903 Central Nervous System #110904 Neurology and Neuromuscular Diseases #Muscle stimulation #functional near infra-red spectroscopy #cortical activation
Tipo

Conference Paper