Response to comments on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"
| Data(s) |
2012
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
Pan et al. claim that our results actually support a strong linear positive relationship between productivity and richness, whereas Fridley et al. contend that the data support a strong humped relationship. These responses illustrate how preoccupation with bivariate patterns distracts from a deeper understanding of the multivariate mechanisms that control these important ecosystem properties. |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| Relação |
DOI:10.1126/science.1214939 Grace, J.B., Adler, P.B., Seabloom, E.W., Borer, E.T., Hillebrand, H., Hautier, Y., Hector, A., Harpole, W.S., O'Halloran, L.R., Anderson, T.M., Bakker, J.D., Brown, C.S., Buckley, Y.M., Collins, S.L., Cottingham, K.L., Crawley, M.J., Damschen, E.I., Davies, K.F., DeCrappeo, N.M., Fay, P.A., Firn, J., Gruner, D.S., Hagenah, N., Jin, V.L., Kirkman, K.P., Knops, J.M.H., La Pierre, K.J., Lambrinos, J.G., Melbourne, B.A., Mitchell, C.E., Moore, J L., Morgan, J.W., Orrock, J.L., Prober, S.M., Stevens, C.J., Wragg, P.D., & Yang, L.H. (2012) Response to comments on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness". Science, 335(6075), p. 1441. |
| Direitos |
Copyright 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| Fonte |
School of Earth, Environmental & Biological Sciences; Science & Engineering Faculty |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
