Principles on assessment of costs on standard basis – necessary or proper


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl
Data(s)

01/11/2007

Resumo

The judgement in Hennessey Glass and Aluminium Pty Ltd v Watpac Australia Pty Ltd [2007] QDC 57 McGill DCJ provides valuable guidance for practitioners as to whether a range of particular costs items should be permitted on an assessment on the standard basis, and the amounts which should be allowed for such items. The items in issue included counsel’s fees and fees paid to expert witnesses. The decision also examined GST implications for the recovery of legal costs.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/51607/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/51607/2/51607.pdf

http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/The_Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor

Jackson, Sheryl (2007) Principles on assessment of costs on standard basis – necessary or proper. Proctor, 27(10), pp. 55-56.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 Sheryl Jackson

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #assessment of costs on standard basis #necessary or proper #fees to expert witnesses #fees to counsel #GST implications
Tipo

Journal Article