Reply to Camens : how recently did modern monotremes diversify?


Autoria(s): Phillips, M.J.; Bennett, T.H.; Lee, M.S.Y.
Data(s)

2010

Resumo

Camens (1) responds to our analysis of morphological data (2) in which platypuses (Ornithorhynchidae) and echidnas (Tachyglossidae) were inferred to be each other's closest relatives, to the exclusion of Early Cretaceous forms, Teinolophos and Steropodon. Our phylogeny is consistent with the late appearance of undisputed fossil echidnas and platypuses. Molecular dating provided important independent corroboration, revealing that platypuses and echidnas diverged only 19–48 Ma, implying that Teinolophos and Steropodon (105–121 Ma) must lie outside the platypus–echidna dichotomy...

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50525/

Publicador

National Academy of Sciences

Relação

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0913152107

Phillips, M.J., Bennett, T.H., & Lee, M.S.Y. (2010) Reply to Camens : how recently did modern monotremes diversify? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(4), E13-E13.

Fonte

Science & Engineering Faculty

Tipo

Review