An attack on Iran: the legal basis, or lack thereof


Autoria(s): Garwood-Gowers, Andrew
Data(s)

19/04/2012

Resumo

Talk of a possible Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities has re-ignited debate over the right of self-defence under international law. Some academics, including Anthony D'Amato and Alan Dershowitz, have claimed that an attack on Iran would be a permissible act of self-defence. Others, such as Kevin Jon Heller, argue that such action would be a clear breach of international law. So, who is correct? Would military action against Iran be legal or illegal?

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/49897/

Publicador

The Conversation Media Group

Relação

http://theconversation.edu.au/an-attack-on-iran-the-legal-basis-or-lack-thereof-6397

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew (2012) An attack on Iran: the legal basis, or lack thereof. The Conversation.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 The Conversation Media Group

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180000 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES #180116 International Law (excl. International Trade Law) #self-defence #pre-emptive anticipatory action #nuclear weapons #Iran #Israel
Tipo

Journal Article