A comparison of the effects of a chlamydial vaccine administered during or after a C. muridarum urogenital infection of female mice


Autoria(s): Carey, Alison J.; Cunningham, Kelly A.; Andrew, Dean; Hafner, Louise M.; Timms, Peter; Beagley, Kenneth
Data(s)

01/09/2011

Resumo

There are approximately 92 million new chlamydial infections of the genital tract in humans diagnosed each year, costing health care systems billions of dollars in treatment not only of acute infections, but also of associated inflammatory sequelae, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and ectopic pregnancy. These numbers are increasing at a steady rate and, due to the asymptomatic nature of infections, the incidence may be underestimated and the costs of treatment therefore higher. Over the previous few decades there has been a large amount of research into the development of an efficacious vaccine against genital tract chlamydial infections. The majority of this research has focused on females, due to the high rate of development of associated diseases, including PID, which can lead to ectopic pregnancy and infertility. In light of the increasing infection rates that have occurred despite the availability of antibiotics, and the asymptomatic nature of chlamydial infections, it is imperative that an efficacious vaccine that protects against infection and associated pathology be developed.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/43942/

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/43942/2/43942.pdf

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.012

Carey, Alison J., Cunningham, Kelly A., Andrew, Dean, Hafner, Louise M., Timms, Peter, & Beagley, Kenneth (2011) A comparison of the effects of a chlamydial vaccine administered during or after a C. muridarum urogenital infection of female mice. Vaccine, 29(38), pp. 6505-6513.

Direitos

Copyright 2011 Elsevier Ltd

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vaccine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Vaccine, [VOL 29, ISSUE 38, (2011)] DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.012

Fonte

Cell & Molecular Biosciences; Faculty of Science and Technology; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; Smart Services CRC

Palavras-Chave #060502 Infectious Agents #Chlamydia #Pathology #Timing of Vaccination
Tipo

Journal Article