Access to medicine and the dangers of patent linkage : lessons from Bayer Corp v. Union of India


Autoria(s): Tsui, Mabel
Data(s)

01/03/2011

Resumo

In February 2010, the Delhi High Court delivered its decision in Bayer Corp v Union of India in which Bayer had appealed against an August 2009 decision of the same court. Both decisions prevented Bayer from introducing the concept of patent linkage into India’s drug regulatory regime. Bayer appealed to the Indian Supreme Court, the highest court in India, which agreed on 2 March 2010 to hear the appeal. Given that India is regarded as a global pharmaceutical manufacturer of generic medications, how its judiciary and government perceive their international obligations has a significant impact on the global access to medicines regime. In rejecting the application of patent linkage, the case provides an opportunity for India to further acknowledge its international human rights obligations.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/41029/

Publicador

Thomson Reuters (Australia/NZ)

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/41029/1/41029.pdf

http://legalonline.thomson.com.au/jour/index.jsp?mainJournalTitle=Journal+of+Law+and+Medicine&curRequestedHref=journals/JLM

Tsui, Mabel (2011) Access to medicine and the dangers of patent linkage : lessons from Bayer Corp v. Union of India. Journal of Law and Medicine, 18(3), pp. 577-588.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180114 Human Rights Law #180115 Intellectual Property Law #TRIPS #access to medicine #India
Tipo

Journal Article