An examination of the sentencing remarks of Indigenous and non-Indigenous criminal defendants in South Australia’s Higher Courts


Autoria(s): Bond, Christine; Jeffries, Samantha
Data(s)

01/12/2009

Resumo

Recent Australian research on Indigenous sentencing primarily explores whether disparities in sentencing outcomes exist. Little is known about how judges perceive or refer to Indigenous defendants and their histories, and how they interpret the circumstances of Indigenous defendants in justifying their sentencing decisions. Drawing on the ‘focal concerns’ approach, this study presents a narrative analysis of a sample of judges’ sentencing remarks for Indigenous and non-Indigenous criminal defendants convicted in South Australia’s Higher Courts. The analysis found that the sentencing stories of Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders differed in ways that possibly reduced assessments of blameworthiness and risk for Indigenous defendants.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/32961/

Publicador

The Australian Sociological Association

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/32961/1/c32961.pdf

Bond, Christine & Jeffries, Samantha (2009) An examination of the sentencing remarks of Indigenous and non-Indigenous criminal defendants in South Australia’s Higher Courts. In Proceeding of The Annual Conference of the Australian Sociological Association 2009, The Australian Sociological Association, Australian National University, Canberra.

Direitos

Copyright 2009 [please consult the authors]

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Justice

Palavras-Chave #160203 Courts and Sentencing #Sentencing #Indigenous #Courts #Narratives #Mitigation
Tipo

Conference Paper