Do research thesis examiners need training? : practitioner stories


Autoria(s): Sankaran, Shankar; Swepson, Pam; Hill, Geof W.
Data(s)

2005

Resumo

We are thesis examiners within the Australian academic system who formed a “community of practice” to try to resolve some of the issues we were facing. Stories of examiners reflecting on and examining their own practice are a notable silence in the higher degree research literature. In this study we have adopted a storytelling inquiry method that involved telling our practitioner stories, firstly to each other and then to a wider audience through this paper. We then identified issues that we believe are relevant to other thesis examiners. We have also found that engaging in a “community of practice” is itself a valuable form of examiner professional development. Key Words: Thesis Examiner Training, Storytelling, and Practitioner Research

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/32866/

Publicador

NOVA Science Publishers, Inc

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/32866/1/c32866.pdf

http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-4/sankaran.pdf

Sankaran, Shankar, Swepson, Pam, & Hill, Geof W. (2005) Do research thesis examiners need training? : practitioner stories. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), pp. 817-835.

Direitos

Copyright 2005 NOVA Science Publishers, Inc

Fonte

Division of Research and Commercialisation

Palavras-Chave #Thesis examination #Practice Based Research #Quality of a dissertation #HERN
Tipo

Journal Article