Prison foodservice in Australia : systems, menus and inmate attitudes


Autoria(s): Williams, Peter; Walton, Karen; Hannan-Jones, Mary T.
Data(s)

03/08/2009

Resumo

This paper presents results from three studies in 25 custodial facilities in three Australian states, including nutrient analyses of menus and focus groups exploring inmate attitudes. Both cook-fresh and cook-chill production systems are used. Non-selective cycle menus of 4-6 weeks are common but inmates can supplement meals by purchase of additional food items (‘buy-ups’). Menus included adequate variety and met most nutritional standards, with the possible exception of fruit. The sodium content of menus is above recommended levels. Protein, fibre, vitamins A, C, thiamin, riboflavin, calcium, iron and zinc were more than adequate, and the percentage energy from fat is close to or meets national recommendations. Focus groups identified 16 themes, including meal quality, food available at ‘buy-ups’, cooking facilities, and concerns about possible food safety risks associated with inmates storing food in cells. Many complaints were about factors not under the control of the foodservice manager.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/31052/

Publicador

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/31052/1/c31052.pdf

DOI:10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00144.x

Williams, Peter, Walton, Karen, & Hannan-Jones, Mary T. (2009) Prison foodservice in Australia : systems, menus and inmate attitudes. Journal of Foodservice, 20(4), pp. 167-180.

Direitos

Copyright 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fonte

Faculty of Health; School of Public Health & Social Work

Palavras-Chave #150401 Food and Hospitality Services #111199 Nutrition and Dietetics not elsewhere classified #Prison Foodservice #Prison Meals
Tipo

Journal Article