Cognitive assessment in closed head injury : stability, validity and parallel forms for two neuropsychological measures of recovery


Autoria(s): DesRosiers, Gabriel; Kavanagh, David J.
Data(s)

1987

Resumo

Investigated the psychometric properties of the original and alternate sets of the Trail Making Test (TMT) and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT; A. L. Benton and D. Hamsher, 1978) in 50 orthopedic and 15 closed head injured (1 yr after trauma) patients (aged 15–59 yrs). Although the alternate forms of both measures proved to be stable and consistent with each other in both groups, only the parallel sets of TMT reliably discriminated the clinical group from controls. Practice effects in the head injured were significant only for Trail B of TMT. Factor analysis of the control group's results identified Verbal Knowledge as a major contributor to performance on COWAT, whereas TMT was more dependent on Rapid Visual Search and Visuomotor Sequencing.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29343/

Publicador

Melnic Press, Inc.

Relação

DesRosiers, Gabriel & Kavanagh, David J. (1987) Cognitive assessment in closed head injury : stability, validity and parallel forms for two neuropsychological measures of recovery. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9(4), pp. 162-173.

Fonte

Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; School of Psychology & Counselling

Tipo

Journal Article