Key performance indicators for innovation implementation : perception vs. actual usage


Autoria(s): Sawang, Sukanlaya
Data(s)

2011

Resumo

This paper aimed to explore the proportion associated with the perceived importance and the actual use of performance indicators from manufacturing and non manufacturing industries. The sample was 86 small and medium sized-organizations in Thailand. The perceived importance and the actual use of financial and non financial indicators were found to be significantly related among manufacturing and non manufacturing industries. KPI 3, 9, and 12 (i.e. sales and sales growth; quality of products and /or services; and process time) were perceived the most importance among manufacturing managers (85.3%, 79.4% and 76.5% respectively). While KPI 6, 9, and 12 (i.e. customer satisfaction, quality of products and /or services; and process time) were perceived the most importance among non manufacturing managers (84.8%, 93.5%, and 84.8% respectively). Interestingly, the most used KPIs for manufacturing were sales and sales growth (64.7%); profit margins (61.8%); and customer satisfaction (84.8) while non manufacturing used quality products/services (60.9%); sales and sales growth (54.3%) and employee development (54.3%) respectively. Limitation and implication were also discussed.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/28486/

Publicador

College of Management, National Cheng Kung University

Relação

http://apmr.management.ncku.edu.tw/comm/updown/DW1103213952.pdf

Sawang, Sukanlaya (2011) Key performance indicators for innovation implementation : perception vs. actual usage. Asia Pacific Management Review, 16(1), pp. 23-29.

Direitos

Copyright 2011 College of Management, National Cheng Kung University

Fonte

QUT Business School

Palavras-Chave #150307 Innovation and Technology Management #Key Performance Indicators #Innovation Implementation #Perceptions #Usage
Tipo

Journal Article