Does pedagogy still rule?


Autoria(s): McAuliffe, Marisha B.; Hargreaves, Douglas; Winter, Abigail J.; Chadwick, Gary
Data(s)

2009

Resumo

Theories on teaching and learning for adult learners are constantly being reviewed and discussed in the higher educational environment. Theories are not static and appear to be in a constant developmental process. This paper discusses three of these theories: pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy. It is argued that although educators engage in many of the principles of either student-centered (andragogy) and self-determined (heutagogy) learning, it is not possible to fully implement either theory. The two main limitations are the requirements of both internal and external stakeholders, such as accrediting bodies and requirements to assess all student learning. A reversion to teacher-centered learning (pedagogy) ensues. In summary, we engage in many action-oriented learning activities but revert to teacher-centered approaches in terms of content and assessment.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/27505/

Publicador

Engineers Media

Relação

http://www.engineersmedia.com.au/journals/aaee/papers5.asp

McAuliffe, Marisha B., Hargreaves, Douglas, Winter, Abigail J., & Chadwick, Gary (2009) Does pedagogy still rule? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1).

Direitos

Copyright 2009 Engineers Australia.

Fonte

Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering; School of Design; School of Engineering Systems

Palavras-Chave #Pedagogy #Andragogy #Heutagogy #Academagogy #Engineering education #HERN
Tipo

Journal Article